Terrell Owens has never been shy about sharing his views, and this week he dived straight into one of the loudest sports debates around. After Stephen A. Smith explained why a former ESPN analyst walked away from First Take, the discussion quickly shifted in a surprising direction.
Owens responded almost immediately, making it clear he didn’t buy Smith’s version of events. Instead, he sided with his former co-host, Max Kellerman, arguing that Smith never matched the balance and on-air chemistry Kellerman brought to the show.
Why Stephen A Smith’s Exit Explanation Sparked A Fresh Wave Of Debate
Operation Sports App
Your ultimate companion for sports gaming. Access in-depth coverage, thoughtful discussion, and a community built around the games—and sports—you love.
Your ultimate sports gaming companion.
The debate gained new energy once Max Kellerman spoke publicly again. On The Bill Simmons Podcast, he finally opened up about why his partnership with Stephen A. Smith fell apart, describing a dynamic that had grown too competitive and imbalanced for the show to function as intended.
“If you’re doing a debate show and you’re a competitive person, why would you want me as a partner?” Kellerman said. “That’s bad. You want to go 15 rounds everyday with Mohammed Kellerman? It’s embarrassing.”
He then suggested that there may have been more behind the decision than simple on-air chemistry. “That’s what I could tell you from my point of view. And I also think that if you make a calculation, that if you can be perceived as a solo act really, that you can get paid at a certain level that you can’t if you’re not a solo act, then you’d like to be a solo act.”
This is where Terrell Owens stepped in and pushed the debate even further. “He knows he can’t hold a candle to Max,” exclaimed Owens.
Owens has had his own history of feuds with Smith, so his support for Kellerman came as no surprise. The Hall of Famer has never shied away from public arguments, including recent back-and-forth moments with Michael Irvin and Cam Newton. His comments added another layer to an already heated discussion, amplifying conversations that fans and analysts were already having about what really happened behind the scenes.
These statements brought old questions back to the surface. People who once wondered about Kellerman’s sudden exit now had clearer insight from both sides, and Owens’ decision to publicly back Kellerman only made the debate louder.
How A Single Kellerman Line Escalated The Back-And-Forth Into A Larger Fan Conversation
Owens’ decision to bring Kellerman into the conversation shifted the tone, and fans quickly took it even further. Social platforms filled with reactions, many of them echoing Owens while revisiting the long-running tension between Stephen A Smith and Max Kellerman.
One fan brought up a moment that still circulates online, writing, “Saying Max was blacker than Stephen A. was cold af lol.” It reminded people how bold and unpredictable Kellerman could be during debates.
Another wrote, “Max respectively was 100% spot on. SAS couldn’t go 12 rounds with Max. It was Canelo vs Crawford. Max was Crawford.” That kind of comparison underscored how some viewers felt Kellerman’s style offered a serious competitive challenge to Smith.
Fans also tied Owens directly to Kellerman’s exit. One wrote, “You the one that got Max fired when you told SAS off ” showing how connected Owens remains to the show’s history. Others focused on how Kellerman was treated in his final years.
“Stephen A was a pure bully to Max… it was everyday… then i guess he got tired and said F This,” one fan claimed, reflecting frustration many viewers felt.
Together, these reactions explained why Owens’ comparison struck a nerve. For fans, this debate was never just about who won arguments. It was about chemistry, respect, and how much control one personality should have on a debate show. Their response showed this conversation had been waiting to resurface.
Published: Dec 5, 2025 02:04 pm