The SEC has had a terrible 2025-2026 college football postseason. After years of being the top conference, their advantage over other conferences like the Big Ten has disappeared. The biggest example of this was the 2026 Rose Bowl, where Indiana crushed Alabama 38-3. Indiana didn’t just win – they dominated Alabama in every way, showing a clear gap between the two teams.
This loss shocked SEC fans, coaches, and their media partners. ESPN, the SEC’s TV partner, has acted like the conference’s PR team for years. Through the SEC Network and commentators like Kirk Herbstreit, ESPN has promoted the SEC constantly. Even Paul Finebaum, who always praised the SEC and criticized other conferences, admitted this postseason exposed their overconfidence.
The problem isn’t just the SEC thinking highly of itself. The real issue is ESPN’s deal with the SEC and how it hurts college football. ESPN makes money from promoting the SEC for higher ratings. ESPN also broadcasts the College Football Playoff, and their commentators often push for more SEC teams to make the playoff. According to Outkick, college football analyst Joel Klatt says he’s had enough of this setup.
Operation Sports App
Your ultimate companion for sports gaming. Access in-depth coverage, thoughtful discussion, and a community built around the games—and sports—you love.
Your ultimate sports gaming companion.
Having one broadcaster control everything creates unfair advantages
Speaking on The Joel Klatt Show, Klatt criticized how one broadcaster controls the entire playoff. He said no playoff should have just one TV partner, especially when that partner has close ties to one specific conference.
“They chose the wrong path when it comes to the presentation of this playoff,” Klatt said. “There is no playoff that should be a single television partner. It just shouldn’t. Because the presentation is important, in particular, when you’re down to this point in the sport where you’re trying to showcase games.”
Klatt works for Fox, which also owns OutKick, but he made it clear he wouldn’t want Fox to have exclusive rights either. He said it wouldn’t be good for the sport if Fox controlled everything, just like it’s not good now with ESPN.
His point makes sense – the College Football Playoff selection committee watches ESPN and gets influenced by them. Similar controversies have emerged in other sports recently, like when Trevor Lawrence surprised fans at a bar, showing how athlete behavior gets scrutinized by media partners.
Alabama was the only team that lost its conference championship game in 2025 but didn’t drop in rankings. They didn’t just lose to Georgia – they got destroyed 28-7. But ESPN had spent the whole week saying the SEC Championship Game result shouldn’t matter and that punishing the loser was wrong.
Kirk Herbstreit even said before the game that “It would have to get really ugly for Alabama to get punished for playing a bonus round game.” These discussions never questioned why conference championship games matter if losing doesn’t hurt your ranking.
Alabama lost badly, had negative rushing yards, and still faced no consequences. The media’s handling of this situation mirrors recent entertainment industry drama, such as John Cena’s backstage WWE controversy over an unplanned moment.
This shows ESPN’s power over the selection committee. If broadcast rights were split among different networks, one network couldn’t have this much influence. The sport might finally get honest evaluations instead of one conference getting promoted over all others.
Published: Jan 8, 2026 04:45 pm