Brittany Renner has stunned the internet with a bold new legal move: she’s requesting a dramatic increase in child support from former partner P.J. Washington, to the tune of $35,000 per month. The move has ignited a firestorm online, with fans divided and many accusing her of overreach, even calling the demand “extortion.”
Renner claims the current support arrangement doesn’t cover the costs she’s facing in California and doesn’t reflect Washington’s wealth and lifestyle. For her part, Washington is being dragged into a very public dispute over how money, fairness, and responsibility should intersect.
High Stakes: Renner Targets $35K from Washington’s NBA Wealth
Renner’s push for $35,000 a month is tied to her move from North Carolina to California with their son, where she says the high cost of living is straining her budget. The original $5,500 deal was set back east, but now she argues the amount doesn’t match the lifestyle their child should have, especially compared to Washington’s comfortable life with his new wife and kids.
The request also ties into their custody battle. A recent clip of a heated exchange during a handoff showed just how tense things have become. Renner’s filing notes Washington’s limited visitation, suggesting she carries most of the parenting load. Experts say courts often consider the child’s accustomed standard of living, but a jump this steep could be closely scrutinized.
Adding to the drama, TMZ reports Washington already paid a $130,000 lump sum last year to cover support and fees, proving he’s been meeting obligations. Renner, however, is also asking for $50,000 more to cover attorney costs, hinting this could spiral into a long and expensive legal fight.
Fans Explode Over Renner’s Child Support Demand from Washington
As soon as word spread, social media lit up. One fan scoffed, saying, “the kid is 3-4 years old… the fuck does she need $35k a month for???” That sentiment echoed across timelines, with many doubting how such a young child could reasonably require that level of support.
Another fan vented frustration about how child support often gets twisted:
“It’s frustrating how child support is constantly weaponized while also being used in any other way except for the actual child. Child support is not to support a parent’s lifestyle; it’s to provide for the child!”
That comment summed up what a lot of critics feel, that Renner’s ask looks more like self-benefit than childcare.
Some went even further, bringing Renner’s past controversies into play. One wrote,
“Brittany Renner is a terrible human being. She wrote an entire book about scamming PJ, videotapes him as she fights with him in front of their child and now tries to extort him for more?? She can rot.”
It shows how public opinion isn’t just about this court filing, but also her history and reputation.
Then there’s a cautious middle ground: critics who point out that while her request is audacious, we don’t know all the financial details. In these legal battles, either side could be misrepresented. The more tempered voices warn against vilifying one party too soon and urge waiting for court rulings rather than social media verdicts.
Ultimately, this isn’t just about money; it’s about narrative. Renner is risking her public image to press a high-stakes claim, and fans’ reactions reflect deeper beliefs about responsibility, gender, and fairness in celebrity relationships.
Published: Oct 3, 2025 03:42 pm