Home
Madden NFL 17 News Post


After releasing the Madden NFL 17 team ratings for the AFC teams yesterday, EA Sports have posted the Madden NFL 17 team ratings for the NFC teams today. They have included the overall team rating, as well as offensive and defensive team ratings.

Check them out below and post your thoughts!
  • Carolina Panthers - Overall 87 (Offense 91 - Defense 87)
  • Green Bay Packers - Overall 85 (Offense 89 - Defense 85)
  • Seattle Seahawks - Overall 85 (Offense 83 - Defense 89)
  • Arizona Cardinals - Overall 84 (Offense 91 - Defense 81)
  • Dallas Cowboys - Overall 84 (Offense 89 - Defense 83)
  • Atlanta Falcons - Overall 81 (Offense 89 - Defense 79)
  • Minnesota Vikings - Overall 81 (Offense 81 - Defense 87)
  • Detroit Lions - Overall 80 (Offense 81 - Defense 83)
  • New York Giants - Overall 80 (Offense 83 - Defense 83)
  • Philadelphia Eagles - Overall 80 (Offense 83 - Defense 83)
  • New Orleans Saints - Overall 80 (Offense 83 - Defense 79)
  • Washington Redskins - Overall 79 (Offense 83 - Defense 81)
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Overall 79 (Offense 83 - Defense 81)
  • Los Angeles Rams - Overall 78 (Offense 79 - Defense 81)
  • San Francisco 49ers - Overall 75 (Offense 75 - Defense 79)
  • Chicago Bears - Overall 74 (Offense 73 - Defense 77)

Game: Madden NFL 17Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 16 - View All
Member Comments
# 1 Birdman18 @ 08/05/16 11:16 AM
The Lions are rated higher than the Vikings?! Wow, I've seen it all now

Edit: I now see it's out of order slightly, but even still.. Lions at 80 and the Vikings at 81 is laughable. Lions lost their 2nd best player in franchise history and added no one to boost that squad.
 
# 2 Cowboy008 @ 08/05/16 11:17 AM
Can't wait for the week 1 rosters to come out so I can start my Bears CFM.
 
# 3 jpdavis82 @ 08/05/16 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman18
The Lions are rated higher than the Vikings?! Wow, I've seen it all now


No they're out of order Vikings 81 Lions 80


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
# 4 Birdman18 @ 08/05/16 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
No they're out of order Vikings 81 Lions 80


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


That being said, 1 point I don't believe sets a playoff team apart from a bottom dweller.
 
# 5 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 11:21 AM
Vikings about 3 points too low.
 
# 6 Birdman18 @ 08/05/16 11:22 AM
Yeah I'm not sold on an 11-5 team being an 81.. I was thinking they'd be closer to 85-87 range, right at or slightly better than Green Bay
 
# 7 brza37 @ 08/05/16 11:23 AM
So the Cards defense is rated 81 OVR? Worse than the Ravens, Giants, Cowboys, Titans, Eagles, Lions and Chargers? Ok.
 
# 8 underdog13 @ 08/05/16 11:23 AM
I don't think these ovrs accurately reflect they players on their teams. Like the individual ratings for players are good but they way they calculate team ovr isn't.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
# 9 jpdavis82 @ 08/05/16 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman18
Yeah I'm not sold on an 11-5 team being an 81.. I was thinking they'd be closer to 85-87 range, right at or slightly better than Green Bay


Near but not better, sorry Vikings overachieved last year, Packers underachieved without Jordy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
# 10 underdog13 @ 08/05/16 11:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cowboy008
Can't wait for the week 1 rosters to come out so I can start my Bears CFM.
Bears are the hardest team to rebuild this year imo.

You need to draft/sign/develop

Qb
Hb
Te
4 outta 5 linemen
Dl
Secondary
 
# 11 Birdman18 @ 08/05/16 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
Near but not better, sorry Vikings overachieved last year, Packers underachieved without Jordy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I disagree with that, but to each their own
 
# 12 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
Near but not better, sorry Vikings overachieved last year, Packers underachieved without Jordy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Given that the Vikings lost the playoff game on a fluke field goal miss, I'd say they underachieved.

I'd agree that the Packers are better than the Vikings but only because of Rodgers.
 
# 13 Cowboy008 @ 08/05/16 11:31 AM
One thing though and I know it's probably stupid but I wish they would have used a different picture of for the Cardinals stadium since we will not be able to have the roof open in CFM.
 
# 14 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/05/16 11:31 AM
Lol the Bears at 74
 
# 15 jpdavis82 @ 08/05/16 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP
Given that the Vikings lost the playoff game on a fluke field goal miss, I'd say they underachieved.



I'd agree that the Packers are better than the Vikings but only because of Rodgers.


GB still rules the NFC North they'll remind everyone of that fact this season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
# 16 Mauer4MVP @ 08/05/16 11:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpdavis82
GB still rules the NFC North they'll remind everyone of that fact this season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No they don't. The Vikings are the reigning division champs. That wasn't a fluke Vikings team like 2012.
 
# 17 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/05/16 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by underdog13
Bears are the hardest team to rebuild this year imo.

You need to draft/sign/develop

Qb
Hb
Te
4 outta 5 linemen
Dl
Secondary


Ehhh only future QB , secondary and maybe 2-3 o linemen , prob another 3-4 DE for hicks when he leaves
 
# 18 J.Cole @ 08/05/16 11:36 AM
Cowboys at 84? Perks of having a Cowboys fan doing the ratings?
 
# 19 jpdavis82 @ 08/05/16 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mauer4MVP
No they don't. The Vikings are the reigning division champs. That wasn't a fluke Vikings team like 2012.


[emoji849] GB dominated the first game and took them lightly in the second game plus they weren't near the same team they will be this year. Rodgers will have another MVP season and GB will maybe lose 1-2 division games.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
# 20 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/05/16 11:36 AM
I can't wait till the season , I'm glad everyone sleeping on Chicago , John Fox 2nd year teams always end up good based on his track record
 

« Previous12345678Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.