04:10 PM - April 11, 2014 by MMChrisS
What excites you more -- jaw-dropping performances by elite athletes or a group of average players that display the very essence of a great team?
More specifically, do you enjoy the model set forth by the Kentucky men's basketball program? By all appearances, it wouldn't be a stretch to label the Wildcats as a stepping stone, not a destination.
The sports purist and team-builder inside of me loathes this model set forth by Kentucky. But at the same time, if it works (and it has -- two title appearances in three years including a championship) and we still complain, maybe that just makes the rest of us 'haters.'
Sound Off: Do you enjoy teams like Kentucky that load up on and lose elite stars yearly, or side with teams built over a longer period of time?
Sports Headlines for April 11, 2014
- Hmmm...ninety-three points on 15 shots is pretty decent -- wait, what!? [Image]
- Minnesota beats North Dakota at the Frozen Four on a goal with 0.6 seconds left. [Animated Gif]
- A young Marcus Smart? That flop was a 'flop.' [YouTube]
- The 2014 Masters tournament -- in one epic photograph. [Image]
- DYK? Greenland can't join FIFA due to their inability to grow regulation-length grass.