Home
Madden NFL 13 News Post


If you can't view the embedded video, click here.

Game: Madden NFL 13Reader Score: 6/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii U / Xbox 360Votes for game: 76 - View All
Madden NFL 13 Videos
Member Comments
# 1 guppya @ 08/21/12 01:46 PM
OMG SOMEBODY FINALLY DOES THIS.

You should have shown Yards per attempt and completion percentage for QBs.

My initial notices:
Mark Sanchez 86.5 QB rating. GTFO Sanchez doing that?
Too many running backs are rushing for a high amount of yards.
 
# 2 TheBleedingRed21 @ 08/21/12 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by guppya
OMG SOMEBODY FINALLY DOES THIS.

You should have shown Yards per attempt and completion percentage for QBs.

My initial notices:
Mark Sanchez 86.5 QB rating. GTFO Sanchez doing that?
Too many running backs are rushing for a high amount of yards.
Do not understand if you think he is too low with that rating or too high?

I think it suits him well. That is not a good rating and it is not a terrible one either. Mediocre at best. (Last year he was 78.2 for rating so do not see your gripe there)

I do agree with the rushing, but maybe they can be fixed? I hope.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/stats/p...ar?&_1:col_1=7

That is last years stats for rushing and they are a little inflated in game.

I think Passing stats are pretty decent.
 
# 3 Wildcats302 @ 08/21/12 01:56 PM
Wes Welker with 1 TD? He tore it up lol
 
# 4 jpcool202020 @ 08/21/12 01:57 PM
No complaints here. Everything looked spot on. Only complaint might be the rush yards for RB's being overall high...but nothing game breaking. Looks like this Madden is gonna be pretty sick.
 
# 5 Nev @ 08/21/12 01:59 PM
Lack of sacks worries me.

13 leads the league by a DT. No OLB's in the top 6.
 
# 6 davo1021 @ 08/21/12 02:01 PM
Only thing I noticed is the rushing yards too. Seemed like a lot of RB's got over 1200 yards.
 
# 7 Bootzilla @ 08/21/12 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davo1021
Only thing I noticed is the rushing yards too. Seemed like a lot of RB's got over 1200 yards.
Probably still not enough touches for 2nd string backs and backs in 2 or 3 back systems.
 
# 8 philliesphan026 @ 08/21/12 02:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by guppya
OMG SOMEBODY FINALLY DOES THIS.

You should have shown Yards per attempt and completion percentage for QBs.
This video was posted by the guy who uploaded it in the "taking questions and video requests" thread at the top of the forum (it was uploaded about an hour or so ago). He made a post a short time later saying highest completion % was 65% with "10-12 guys above 60%". Top 5 was like 65, 63, 63, 62, 62, or something like that.
 
# 9 Dogslax41 @ 08/21/12 02:25 PM
Everything in there with the exception of sacks, as pointed out, is better than anything I have seen out of the box even including The Show and NBA2k12.
 
# 10 themassacre771.1 @ 08/21/12 02:25 PM
Why the hell was Mcnabb the Vikes QB? Is this 12 but being faked as 13?
 
# 11 bxgoods @ 08/21/12 02:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nev
Lack of sacks worries me.

13 leads the league by a DT. No OLB's in the top 6.

Thats what I noticed also. Lack of OLB's has always been a problem.
 
# 12 Schreck11 @ 08/21/12 02:49 PM
I thought TD passes were pretty high for a few guys like Luck and Sanchez who both threw 34 i think?
 
# 13 jpdavis82 @ 08/21/12 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by themassacre771.1
Why the hell was Mcnabb the Vikes QB? Is this 12 but being faked as 13?
Um maybe he was signed by them as a FA. Pretty sure RG3 and his picture aren't in Madden 12. No this isn't fake it's real.
 
# 14 Schreck11 @ 08/21/12 02:57 PM
Yeah McNabb will be a FA in this game. But kinda strange how the Vikings would sign him again. I wont have to worry though because I'm rolling with the Vikes.
 
# 15 seasprite @ 08/21/12 02:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawHat Patriot
Welker with only one touchdown reception.
Is it possible that he was injured for a majority of the year? I cant watch the video here at work, so I dont know if it shows that this isnt the case.
 
# 16 HadlerT @ 08/21/12 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by seasprite
Is it possible that he was injured for a majority of the year? I cant watch the video here at work, so I don't know if it shows that this isn't the case.
He had like 90 receptions and 1000+ yards, so I doubt it. Brandon Lloyd, Gronkowski, Aaron Hernandez and Deon Branch could've been utilized more in the Red zone.
 
# 17 BCJMU99 @ 08/21/12 03:16 PM
What kind of trades went on during the season/off-season (if you did the off-season)?
 
# 18 seasprite @ 08/21/12 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrawHat Patriot
Let's see:

86 Receptions
1041 Receiving Yards
12.1 Average YPC
82.3 AVG YPG

That's more than some of the other guys who had like 6-14 TD's.
Like I said, I wasnt able to watch the video............you would think that with those catches and yards, he would have had more than 5 TDs
 
# 19 jpdavis82 @ 08/21/12 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schreck11
Yeah McNabb will be a FA in this game. But kinda strange how the Vikings would sign him again. I wont have to worry though because I'm rolling with the Vikes.
I'm guessing Ponder got hurt midseason and they went and signed McNabb to replace him. Look at Ponder's stats. I'm sure Welker got hurt too or else like someone suggested Brady looked for Gronk, Hernandez, Lloyd more often in RZ.
 
# 20 seasprite @ 08/21/12 03:22 PM
Well actually, in 08 he had 111 receptions for 1165 yards and only 3 td's. Im not overly concerned about it though
 

« Previous1234Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.