03:25 PM - June 7, 2012 by MMChrisS
These are the team overall ratings from the E3 build so obviously they're not final just yet. What do all you think? Any anomalies?
Madden NFL 13 News Post
03:25 PM - June 7, 2012 by MMChrisSMadden NFL 13 Videos
Member Comments
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 4
Chrisksaint @ 06/07/12 03:28 PM
Don't agree with the Saints rating at all compared to the other teams. Top Offense and the defense on paper significantly improved.
# 5
WSUCougars @ 06/07/12 03:28 PM
The Seahawks are a 73.... is that a joke? They're supposed to contend in the NFC West with one of the most stout defenses in the league! Plus with the addition of Matt Flynn?? QB was our only hole last year! HOW!?
# 6
WSUCougars @ 06/07/12 03:29 PM
That puts the Seahawks in the bottom 10 teams in the league. Blasphemy.
I don't like the Broncos being rated lower than the Chargers big time since we just came off of winning the division and on top of that replacing Tebow with Manning to me seems like a nice upgrade...
# 8
azdawgpound @ 06/07/12 03:31 PM
wow 67 for browns what the heck are the players ratings all in 50's? to get as team overall of 67? seems every yr we go down a point or more last yr we was a 72? so somehow we ended up losing 5 overall points? funny thing is the redskins are rated an 78? they had the second worst record last yr and u saying they have the talent to be almost an 80?
Not sure how the Lions are a 77 when comparing them to the Bears (78), Jets (79), Panthers (76) and Redskins (78). I'm pretty confident in saying if those teams are where they are ranked, the Lions should easily be an 80, with the Saints being in the low 80's.
I thought the Lions and Niners would have been higher. Patriots are overrated. Surprised the Steelers are still that high with some of the guys they lost this offseason. Texans should be higher, especially with how great their depth is as they showed last season. Thought the Seahawks would have been at least in the high-mid 70's.
The Eagles could be argued either way. An 8-8 team really doesn't deserve an 84 but it is hard to disagree that they have a lot of talent.
But then again, as I don't know the formula for how they rate these teams, I guess none of it really matters.
The Eagles could be argued either way. An 8-8 team really doesn't deserve an 84 but it is hard to disagree that they have a lot of talent.
But then again, as I don't know the formula for how they rate these teams, I guess none of it really matters.
# 12
Big_Mig_11 @ 06/07/12 03:37 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
And to add on to my other statement the Raiders dropping that far below the rest of the AFC West at 70 seems odd considering 1 game seperated that whole division. To me they should all be close to the same rating which they are minus the Raiders.
# 14
at23steelers @ 06/07/12 03:42 PM
Are these Donny's made up ratings again?? Im surprised how low the highest teams are. How can the Giants not be the highest rated or at least tied? Add to the fact, the 8-8 Eagles are tied with them. Im just going to take these with a grain of salt. No, that's probably too much value, a half a grain of salt!
# 15
Pappy Knuckles @ 06/07/12 03:44 PM
That 66 for the Colts is looking real ugly. I can't wait to see what I can do with the squad this season.
# 18
azdawgpound @ 06/07/12 03:53 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
thats true i forgot about them trading up but still who do they have on that team that they derserve an 78? they have a buncha nobody's @ wr,te and most there postions.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Post A Comment
Working...