Home
NCAA Football 13 News Post


Check out the latest NCAA Football 13 screenshot, featuring Oklahoma vs. West Virginia.

Game: NCAA Football 13Reader Score: 7/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 59 - View All
NCAA Football 13 Videos
Member Comments
# 1 JerzeyReign @ 05/16/12 01:38 PM
You know you've been on OS too long when you look at a virtual player's muscle definition -- bu I bet within the first 15 posts somebody will comment on the football size, lol


The only thing wrong with this pic is that WVU is in the Big 12 -- thats just fugly
 
# 2 capn_razzamataz @ 05/16/12 01:45 PM
It's as if EA is just taunting me with the ankle socks.

EA: "Yeah, the ankle socks are STILL in the game AND THEY ALWAYS WILL BE! But you'll still buy the game anyways because you're an idiot!"

Me: *sulking* "You're right. Here's my money."
 
# 3 frankrizzo380 @ 05/16/12 01:45 PM
This pic is still showing '12 graphics right steve? if so, why waste time posting it? Nothin like some guy on guy action to hype me up for July 10th!
 
# 4 crques @ 05/16/12 01:45 PM
Well, now that you mention it.......the football reminds me of a picture of me when I was about 5 or 6 wearing one of those generic uniforms with a plastic helmet. I was holding an official NFL size football and it was as big as the upper half of my body. I do wish they would reduce the size of the football a bit, but that isn't my biggest complaint with the next generation versions of this game. I can live with it.
 
# 5 sportzbro @ 05/16/12 01:54 PM
The old cleats and ankle socks are really a bummer.

Also, OU's crimson color has never been right.
 
# 6 DirtyJerz32 @ 05/16/12 02:05 PM
Looks like 2012 to me. I know it's not, but I don't see any difference.
 
# 7 Pezell04x @ 05/16/12 02:11 PM
Wait for it:

- cleats
- ankle socks
- facemasks
- equipment
- team color

aaaaaaaaaaaand go!
 
# 8 IamLEGENDsince87 @ 05/16/12 02:18 PM
another disappointing screenshot...smh
 
# 9 merchant1874 @ 05/16/12 02:23 PM
Ok il go first and im being serious^^^^^^

Why in the hell do they still have those ankle socks?
Why are the colors STILL wrong and washed out?
Why is the football so darn big?

Is this actually a pic from 12?
 
# 10 DickDalewood @ 05/16/12 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyJerz32
Looks like 2021 to me. I know it's not, but I don't see any difference.
I think we'll be getting even better graphics by then :P
 
# 11 DirtyJerz32 @ 05/16/12 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DickDalewood
I think we'll be getting even better graphics by then :P
Updated.
 
# 12 Playmakers @ 05/16/12 04:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigturboweeni3
where the hell are the new face masks??? this must be ncaa 12.
here we go again....

 
# 13 TDenverFan @ 05/16/12 04:31 PM
The ball looks like a decent size.

I still don't get the obsession of having every facemask in the game. To me, as long as they have a decent selection (Which they do) it's good.
 
# 14 BA2929 @ 05/16/12 04:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Playmakers
here we go again....

LOL Did you expect anything else? Someone complains about this every time a pic/video is posted. EVERY SINGLE TIME! You figure they'd realize this is what they're getting every year and stop complaining about it IN EVERY SINGLE THREAD ON OS. (I realize you were using sarcasm. Your post was just the easiest to quote)

On topic: I think it looks good. I like the blocking in the background. Looks realistic to me.
 
# 15 legendkiller5 @ 05/16/12 04:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDenverFan
The ball looks like a decent size.

I still don't get the obsession of having every facemask in the game. To me, as long as they have a decent selection (Which they do) it's good.
The problem is the 'decent selection' includes facemasks no player at any level wears or very few still wear, while facemasks that are becoming more and more popular are omitted.

Schools like Mizzou, Nebraska, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Florida among others have become strictly revolution helmet/facemask schools, with many others having a good number of their players wearing them.

I don't think it's too much to ask to have facemasks that many college players started wearing back in 2010-11 to be included in this year's game, especially when Madden includes them, being as they aren't as popular in the pro game.
 
# 16 BA2929 @ 05/16/12 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigturboweeni3
shutup! no one..and i mean NO ONE, still wears that facemask that geno smith is wearing for west virginia. find me one player from the 2011 season that wore this mask. if you cant, just st**
But does it need to be brought up on every single thread that has a pic/video? Everyone knows you guys are unhappy with the facemasks. Just like people are upset about socks/cleats/hair. It just gets old that we can't even have one single thread with a picture or video without someone complaining about these things. I understand it's a big issue for the small minority, but you don't see me going into every thread complaining that KU doesn't run out of a tunnel in real life, but they do in the game.
 
# 17 BA2929 @ 05/16/12 04:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigturboweeni3
THANK YOU!!!! at least someone on this board actually watches college football. why still show facemasks that no collegiate player even wears??? GET RID OF THEM AND IMPLEMENT WHAT'S CURRENT!!!!! FANS ASK FOR CURRENT UNIFORMS....SO GET THE DAMN FACEMASKS (CURRENT HELMETS) RIGHT! why is this a problem, when madden does it right every year? oh wait, the same damn company!?! just stupid...so friggin stupid
Madden also has only 32 teams. NCAA has 120ish. You can't compare the games when small things like this are what you're complaining about. Would your rather have them spend 2 weeks on socks and facemasks? Or 2 weeks refining the passing game?
 
# 18 capn_razzamataz @ 05/16/12 04:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1GATOR FAN
How could socks effect if you buy the game or not lol? I mean I understand all the stuff they have wrong but socks is not at the top of my list

But to each his own
It's not affecting my decision to purchase. I already pre-ordered the game from Amazon (damn you, exclusive uniforms!). It just comes across as EA being unbelievably lazy that something so seemingly simple to fix has been wrong for so long. A lot of people have pointed this out for the past several years yet it goes unchanged.

Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe making medium socks the default IS rocket science. Maybe it would take a whole team of people 5 months to change. But without knowing any better, I'm going to assume they're just being lazy until it changes.
 
# 19 capn_razzamataz @ 05/16/12 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BA2929
Madden also has only 32 teams. NCAA has 120ish. You can't compare the games when small things like this are what you're complaining about. Would your rather have them spend 2 weeks on socks and facemasks? Or 2 weeks refining the passing game?
Assuming you mean taking two weeks out of the regular development cycle, I'd have to say socks and facemasks. They would NEVER touch socks or facemasks in a patch (as evidenced by the past few years), but I'd imagine they would refine the passing mechanics -- a back of the box feature -- in a patch if it was necessary.
 
# 20 BA2929 @ 05/16/12 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJACK
C'mon.. Gameplay team and Art team are completely separate you should know that by now. It's more like would you rather them spend 2 weeks on facemasks or 2 weeks on USC song girls..... Well we all know what route they chose there..
You're right, but we'd still get complaining either way. Someone would be here complaining that USC doesn't have song girls instead of correct facemasks. They lose either way. But I'm done arguing this. I don't know why I got into it in the first place. I guess I'm just feeling argumentative today.
 

« Previous1234Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.