Home
UFC Undisputed 2010 News Post


Gamezone has posted the overall ratings for all of the UFC 2010 Undisputed fighters.

I'll list the heavyweights here. Check the link to see the rest of them.

Quote:
  • Brock Lesnar 77
  • Frank Mir 77
  • Cain Velasquez 77
  • Shane Carwin 76
  • Minotauro Nogueria 76
  • Junior Dos Santos 75
  • Gabriel Gonzaga 74
  • Andrei Arlovski 74
  • Fabricio Werdum 74
  • Antoni Hardonk 74
  • Cheick Kongo 74
  • Brandon Vera 73
  • Todd Duffee 73
  • Mark Coleman 72
  • Pat Barry 72
  • Stefan Struve 72
  • Mirko Cro Cop 72
  • Heath Herring 72
  • Justin McCully 71
  • Eddie Sanchez 69
  • Mostapha Al Turk 69
  • Kimbo Slice 67

Game: UFC Undisputed 2010Reader Score: 6/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 17 - View All
UFC Undisputed 2010 Videos
Member Comments
# 1 allBthere @ 05/04/10 09:31 PM
I didn't notice an 'overall' anywhere in the demo...did I just not see it?

I thought they were not visible this year actually (and in real terms the parts are larger than the sum in some ways)
 
# 2 Steve_OS @ 05/04/10 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
I didn't notice an 'overall' anywhere in the demo...did I just not see it?

I thought they were not visible this year actually (and in real terms the parts are larger than the sum in some ways)
They have "final code".
 
# 3 jb12780 @ 05/04/10 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
I didn't notice an 'overall' anywhere in the demo...did I just not see it?

I thought they were not visible this year actually (and in real terms the parts are larger than the sum in some ways)
Its not there. I think this is bogus IMO.
 
# 4 Steve_OS @ 05/04/10 09:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jb12780
Its not there. I think this is bogus IMO.
LOL, read the first sentence of his opening paragraph.

Recently sitting down with a more complete preview build of UFC Undisputed 2010, we decided to dig deep and take a gander at the overall ratings which were found within the Tournament mode for all the fighters.

They have no reason to lie about it, they are a legit site.
 
# 5 filtertmp @ 05/04/10 09:47 PM
As I don't see dan 'the beast' severn listed I'll just assume he is rated 100.


Also, jonny bones as the 20th best LHW? Look at some of the people in front of him... right.
 
# 6 PlatooN @ 05/04/10 10:07 PM
is it me or do the ratings seem awfully low for all the fights? Brock may not be the best in the world but wouldn't you rating one of the best in the 90's and not high 70s? I'm not a Brock fan and this isn't about him but the top guys should have high ratings...no?
 
# 7 mikenoob @ 05/04/10 10:18 PM
He does have a high rating for the scale range of the ratings. 77 is definitely considered a high rating, if the highest is 79 with only 2 guys holding it.
 
# 8 Gotmadskillzson @ 05/04/10 11:50 PM
Heavyweights:

Brock Lesnar – 77
Frank Mir – 77
Cain Velasquez – 77
Shane Carwin – 76
Minotauro Nogueria – 76
Junior Dos Santos – 75
Gabriel Gonzaga – 74
Andrei Arlovski – 74
Fabricio Werdum – 74
Antoni Hardonk – 74
Cheick Kongo – 74
Brandon Vera – 73
Todd Duffee – 73
Mark Coleman – 72
Pat Barry – 72
Stefan Struve – 72
Mirko Cro Cop – 72
Heath Herring – 72
Justin McCully – 71
Eddie Sanchez – 69
Mostapha Al Turk – 69
Kimbo Slice – 67

Light-Heavyweights:

Lyoto Machida – 78
Anderson Silva – 78
Shogun Rua – 77
Rampage Jackson – 76
Vitor Belfort – 76
Dan Henderson – 76
Thiago Silva – 76
Rashad Evans – 76
Rich Franklin – 75
Wanderlei Silva – 74
Michael Bisping – 74
Tito Ortiz – 74
Forrest Griffin – 73
Brandon Vera – 73
Ryan Bader – 73
Luiz Cane – 73
Steve Cantwell – 73
Matt Hamill – 73
Jon Jones – 72
Mark Coleman – 72
Wilson Gouveia – 72
Chuck Liddell – 72
Krzysztof Soszynski – 71
Jason Brilz – 71
Keith Jardine – 70
Stephan Bonnar – 69

Middleweights:

Anderson Silva – 78
Nate Marquardt – 77
Chael Sonnen – 76
Yushin Okami – 76
Demian Maia – 76
Dan Henderson -76
Vitor Belfort – 76
Rich Franklin – 75
Mike Swick – 74
Wanderlei Silva – 74
Michael Bisping – 74
Yoshiro Akiyama – 73
Kendall Grove – 72
Chris Leben – 72
Dan Miller – 72
Martin Kampmann – 72
Wilson Gouveia – 72
Alan Belcher – 72
Patrick Cote – 71
Ricardo Almeida – 70
Nate Quarry – 70
Denis Kang – 70
Drew McFedries – 67

Welterweights:

Georges St-Pierre – 79
BJ Penn – 78
Jon Fitch – 77
Josh Koscheck – 76
Matt Hughes – 76
Thiago Alves – 76
Sean Sherk – 76
Matt Serra – 75
Mike Swick – 74
Dan Hardy – 74
Paulo Thiago – 74
Diego Sanchez – 74
Karo Parisyan – 73
Carlos Condit – 73
Martin Kampmann – 72
Amir Sadollah – 72
Dustin Hazelett – 72
Dong Hyun Kim – 72
Marcus Davis – 71
James Wilks – 71
Frank Trigg – 71
Chris Lytle – 69
Anthony Johnson – 69

Lightweights:

BJ Penn – 79
Kenny Florian – 77
Frank Edgar – 77
Tyson Griffin – 77
Gray Maynard – 77
Sean Sherk – 77
Matt Serra – 75
Diego Sanchez – 74
Nate Diaz – 73
Joe Stevenson – 73
Clay Guida – 73
Spencer Fisher – 72
Hermes Franca – 71
Ross Pearson – 70
Terry Etim – 70
Cole Miller – 70
Kurt Pellegrino – 70
Joe Lauzon – 70
Efrain Escudero – 69
Caol Uno – 69
Dennis Siver – 69
 
# 9 Gotmadskillzson @ 05/04/10 11:53 PM
For the love of God I hope some of these ratings are wrong. You trying to tell me Anthony Johnson, Lauzon, Efrain, Cote, etc are only a few numbers better then Kimbo ? Are you serious ???????? LOL

And Forrest is only a 73 ???????? LOL
 
# 10 boxboy99 @ 05/04/10 11:57 PM
The ratings are not spread out at all. Everyone is pretty much within 10 points. Maybe the overall is meaningless in this game.
 
# 11 jeremym480 @ 05/04/10 11:58 PM
Wow, there doesn't seem to be much separation between the top and bottom of the division's.
 
# 12 jeremym480 @ 05/05/10 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotmadskillzson
For the love of God I hope some of these ratings are wrong. You trying to tell me Anthony Johnson, Lauzon, Efrain, Cote, etc are only a few numbers better then Kimbo ? Are you serious ???????? LOL

And Forrest is only a 73 ???????? LOL
Tito is ahead of Forrest, SMH.
 
# 13 Gotmadskillzson @ 05/05/10 12:03 AM
Is it even worse, Bispeng and Thiago is ranked even higher then Tito...........WOW
 
# 14 toine2983 @ 05/05/10 12:56 AM
These ratings seem bogus to me.

Why is every fighter rated in the 70s?

And why aren't the ratings more spread out to distinguish between the elite and mediocre fighters?
 
# 15 sb24 @ 05/05/10 10:10 AM
I dont have a problem with this. I dont think we will see the top guys used all the time now.
 
# 16 Steve_OS @ 05/05/10 10:19 AM
For those that still don't believe what I said earlier, one of the Gamezone editors shared w/ me this screenshot. I've been working on getting 360 code, but have no luck. Oh well.

 
# 17 UNC_Pete @ 05/05/10 12:08 PM
Even though the ratings are all in the 70s, maybe some of the lower guys have less skills than the higher guys??
 
# 18 jeremym480 @ 05/05/10 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC_Pete
Even though the ratings are all in the 70s, maybe some of the lower guys have less skills than the higher guys??
I sure hope so...
 
# 19 filtertmp @ 05/05/10 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SA1NT401
GSP a 79? WOW....Should be like an 89-95. Guess we will be running into CAF way more than real ones since you can get your CAF up to a 100 with good training.
The scale is relative... GSP's rating doesn't matter as its the highest, the only thing you might argue is the lack of distinction between him and the 2nd best welterweight (and third and so on). What if for instance the limit for the real fighters is set at 80 instead of 100? I'd say its fair to score gsp 79/80 as long as grease application isnt a stat (zing.)


As for the CAF having higher ratings, it was the same in the last iteration but there was a filter in matchmaking to avoid CAF fights (something I used often when I found out 99% of created fighters were 6'6" with 115 in sub offense, etc.) Hopefully the same option is in 2010.
 
# 20 Jukeman @ 05/05/10 01:49 PM
I have no problem with the ratings, im glad they are low, now lets hope they actually mean something.

Not pissed about the 10 point difference from highest to lowest, it is the UFC and Donna wants the best, plus now online wont be the same 8-10 fighters all the time...

Also move sets might make fighters different more so than the OVERALL rating(Level 3 vs Level 1)

Im more interested on how the other stats look...
 

« Previous12Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.