Home
Madden 09 News Post

Pasta Padre has posted player and team ratings for Madden NFL 09.

Quote:
"Looking forward to Madden 09 ratings? Well here you can find overall player ratings via pictures of each teamís current depth chart. Most of the players will be listed on these, though ones that are low on the depth chart (such as WRs) wonít be displayed. Keep in mind that it is possible the ratings will change by release. Continue on to view the pictures within a gallery setting and the team ratings list."

Game: Madden NFL 09Reader Score: 7/10 - Vote Now
Platform: NDS / PS2 / PS3 / PSP / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 88 - View All
Madden NFL 09 Videos
Member Comments
# 1 HustlinOwl @ 06/01/08 02:39 AM
Im an Eagles fan and who the hell is J. Parker at LE? WTF should be Jaqua Thomas
 
# 2 HustlinOwl @ 06/01/08 02:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HustlinOwl
Im an Eagles fan and who the hell is J. Parker at LE? WTF should be Jaqua Thomas
Juqua changed his name, I think the Eagles lead the league in that crap
 
# 3 gta95 @ 06/01/08 03:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by a4reak
lol first Will Peterson now Juqua Thomas
William Thomas also changed his name back to Tre
 
# 4 Nza @ 06/01/08 05:33 AM
No real complaints here looking at the Titans from a depth chart level at all - in fact, a pretty good job. But from a team OVR point of view, 84 seems quite low. I know it's not necessarily based on player OVR's, but it still seems a little low considering some of the teams ahead of them. When you look at the Titans, the only positions lower than 84 OVR are WR, one OG, one DE and MLB. Would have thought that would generate a team OVR of at least 88 ish.
 
# 5 Crawi @ 06/01/08 09:09 AM
Was hoping to see Otah for the Panthers, but his position is blank.
 
# 6 Scott @ 06/01/08 09:18 AM
Rookies are being rated too high....Martellus Bennett a 3rd Round pick an 80 for the Cowboys? How the hell is Bobby Carpenter rated an 80 when he's done absolutely nothing.
 
# 7 Scott @ 06/01/08 09:33 AM
Cowboy Ratings IMO
Romo - 94
Brad Johnson - 74
Barber - 88
F. Jones - 75
T. Choice - 69
Owens - 94
Crayton - 80
Glenn - 78
Witten - 96
Bennett - 72
Curtis - 72
Adams - 93
Free - 73
McQuistan - 74
Kosier - 81
Gurode - 88
Proctor - 66
L. Davis - 91
Berger - 65
Columbo - 80
Marten - 70
Spears - 78
Hatcher - 70
Canty - 80
Bowen - 67
Ratliff - 81
T. Johnson - 77
G. Ellis - 85
A. Spencer - 79
E. Walden - 66
Z. Thomas - 83
B. James - 86
K. Burnett - 81
D. Ware - 97
B. Carpenter - 72
J. Rogers - 67
T. Newman - 93
A. Henry - 83
M. Jenkins - 75
K. Hamlin - 90
C. Brown - 66
R. Williams - 83
P. Watkins - 76
 
# 8 countryboy @ 06/01/08 09:38 AM
Brian Brohm - 80

Harry Douglas - 79




And my Raiders aren't the lowest rated team in the game!
 
# 9 Ceothachosen1 @ 06/01/08 10:40 AM
clinton portis is underated
a lot of other people are overated
 
# 10 Brandwin @ 06/01/08 11:02 AM
Niners are one of the worse overall rated teams, but looking at their starters, it's not to bad at all.

Patrick Willis is a 96 WHAT!
 
# 11 Matt Diesel @ 06/01/08 11:37 AM
The defensive depth charts looks like they are only for the 4-3. ie you would have the 1st string MLB as one ILB and the second string as the other ILB. I guess the third string backs up both? Conclusion: It does not look like thare is an ILB spot for Ds that use them.

I really dont 'get' the ratings. Shouldnt the 'worse' person in the league be rated a 1 and the best a 99? If everyone is rated 65+, whats the point of having a 100 point scale for ratings? They really need to find another way to rate the players. You cant quantify everything about a player.

And Brady Quinn an 81? Must be because his handsomeness rating is pulling up his other ratings.
 
# 12 countryboy @ 06/01/08 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mddst34

And Brady Quinn an 81? Must be because his handsomeness rating is pulling up his other ratings.
 
# 13 WatchdogXC @ 06/01/08 12:29 PM
Yeah, I've always wondered why EA has all the players rated so high. It gets to the point where an 80 is considered bad.

I would have liked to have seen what Josh Cribbs was rated.
 
# 14 ChuckMonts @ 06/01/08 12:34 PM
overall the lions ratings are pretty good. The word in camp is that Lenon will stay at MLB so Dizon and learn and Alex Lewis will start at OLB opposite of Sims.
 
# 15 PaperLantern @ 06/01/08 03:15 PM
Raiders rated 71 overall? C'mon!

Oh well, looks like Fargas is finally getting some love at 85 overall, and Asomugha is a 96, so I guess it's all good. Jemarcus is a little low at 82, considering Brady Quinn is an 81, but I'm liking it.

Also... Aqib Talib only an 80?
 
# 16 phant030 @ 06/01/08 04:33 PM
David Garrad w/ 78 Awr and D. Mcnabb 83 Awr! Total disrespect for the game and Black QBs.
 
# 17 Scott @ 06/01/08 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by phant030
David Garrad w/ 78 Awr and D. Mcnabb 83 Awr! Total disrespect for the game and Black QBs.
Oh please since when is an 83 a bad rating. Also Talib an 80? That's ridiculous, The only rookies who should be in the 80s are the Top 5. No way Quinn deserves to be an 81, more like a 75 IMO.
 
# 18 AftershockFx @ 06/01/08 06:17 PM
No real complaints here looking at the Steelers except for Kemoeatu should be rated at about an 82 imo but, that's just me. Otherwise everything else looks good. Does anyone know if we can get a chance to see the kicker and punter ratings ? I'm interested in seeing what they rated Jeff Reed, Daniel Sepulveda and Nate Washington.
 
# 19 chadskee @ 06/01/08 06:30 PM
The Vikings D-line is so incredible. Plus Adrien gets a 95 while Chester is an 88. Crazy.
 
# 20 lostone @ 06/01/08 06:32 PM
when i looked at the falcons... i agree with all ratings accept

Boley ... he deserves at least a 93
 

« Previous123Next »

Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.