Scott's OSFM ZiPS Re-rated Rosters

[blueduke]

Quote: Originally Posted by rjackson

Your self-concept is a lot different than my perceptions of your actions.

You don't say? LOL. "But I yelled loudest from the tallest tree so that means I win! Weee!!!!!! I'm the master, biatch" Good Lord

My posts re: Scott in this thread (and once again for the slow witted "defender" of him: he needs no defending! Here's hoping you can finally grasp that) has been anything but the picture you're trying to frame here. Go back and read them. They speak for themselves

I don't blame you for perceiving I'm kissing Scott's butt or that I'm immature but here's the reality:

No here's the reality.....the kid who crys foul over his friend's supposedly mistreatment goes one step further and resorts to childish taunts and name calling. Hopefully in the future you'll start acting your age. But then again maybe you are?

I put you in your place and I wanted you to know it so it is natural that you get defensive.

"What's natural" is a little kid acting like a little kid when something doesn't go his way. So desperate to win an argument that you're clearly forced to paint your own picture of events and pretend what really happened didn't happen so that you might finally be able to make some sort of semi-viable point to argue... at which point you've simply managed to beat yourself, and clearly that's something at which you're well-practiced. Congrats.

Thing about all this while Scott clearly doesn't need (nor asked for) your help he took care of "low blow" shots quickly and forcefully all by himself. Putting someone on ignore can do that you know (or do you?) He did it without the help of the loud talking, potty mouthed defender of all things Scott, Instead of attempting to create your own reality perhaps it would be better to let Scott take care of himself? You look silly, friend

[rjackson]

Meh. I'm not continuing this off topic debate which is no longer even intelligible anymore. What I got is that I'm a Scott defender and childish again rather than a reaction to the main point which you seem to have missed due to my calling you out.

I've made my point that unconstructive criticism of not just Scott but any contributor to the community has an adverse affect on the community. It got backed up by contributors.

Your thought that I am a Scott defender is a misguided preconception. Go back 500 pages or so where I encouraged delegation.

I will apologize for my obviously semi-humorous poke at you. It has stirred pointlessness just as your original comment stirred further discontent which we agree we are both tired of reading. You seem intelligent and I think that we can move past that. There is no prize for winning an internet argument, right?

I will not comment further. We are both above that.

PS That Baez reference was a joke--let's not get into that again!!!!

[RGmoney]

By request of Scott, this thread is closed until further notice.

Closed