Browns Backers (OS Branch) - Page 3 - Operation Sports Forums
Home

Browns Backers (OS Branch)

This is a discussion on Browns Backers (OS Branch) within the NFL Official Team Threads forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football > NFL Official Team Threads
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-27-2012, 11:37 PM   #21
Pro
 
khaled's Arena
 
OVR: 10
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
PS Network: KING_KHALED
Re: Browns Backers (OS Branch)

Quote:
Originally Posted by elgreazy1
Terrible. Regardless if they stuck with McCoy, neither of these two guys still has a receiving threat. Richardson is a nice piece but what's to stop a team from loading up the box and challenging their subpar WR-corps? Why invest in a QB who will be too old before the roster is allowed to be built in around him? He'll be in his mid 30's before this roster is close to competitive in that division.
That's what I was thinking. No upgrade at WR. Colt struggled with no play makers and Weeden will too. It's not like they're a QB away from competing for championships. They should've taken traded down and taken Hill or Quick, heck any WR. Little will be good in a couple of years, but could not catch last season. Browns were #1 in dropped passes last season.

__________________
Texas Longhorns
Dallas Cowboys
SA Spurs

khaled is offline  
Reply With Quote
Sponsors (you can remove in-post ad banners by registering or logging in)
Old 05-02-2012, 01:04 AM   #22
Finally Showed the World!
 
CardsFan27's Arena
 
OVR: 20
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 6,559
PS Network: Illini_M1ke
Re: Browns Backers (OS Branch)

Quote:
Originally Posted by khaled
That's what I was thinking. No upgrade at WR. Colt struggled with no play makers and Weeden will too. It's not like they're a QB away from competing for championships. They should've taken traded down and taken Hill or Quick, heck any WR. Little will be good in a couple of years, but could not catch last season. Browns were #1 in dropped passes last season.
Colt struggled because his arm limits what he can do, when you have no running threat and your QB isn't capable of going deep you have a very easy offense to shutdown.

We have a running game now with Richardson and a QB who has an arm that allows him to make all the throws.

Richardson alone is going to make our receivers lives much easier due to teams have to respect our ground game, Little showed he can play last year and I think he'll be even better this year (remember he was coming in after not playing for a year last season), Massaquoi had his best season his rookie year when he had a strong armed QB (Derek Anderson) throwing him the ball down field, Cribbs is good if you can get him the ball in space so he can use his play making ability, then we have Norwood who showed he can be a dependable slot guy last year although with his small build he is injury prone.

Now with having a strong armed QB we have two speed guys who could be weapons in Carlton Mitchell who hasn't played much to this point and new 4th round pick Travis Benjamin.

The Browns don't have a great set of wide receivers by any means but I don't think they're as poor as they appeared last season either, like I said we had Hillis acting like a ***** all year and then Hardesty had a really disappointing year, Ogbonnaya was solid but teams don't stack the box to stop Chris Ogbonnaya.

Having a running game and a QB with a stronger arm will open things up in a big way for our WRs, if the FO thought Colt would be capable of leading the team they wouldn't have chosen a QB in the first round. Holmgrem has obviously seen enough of Colt to determine he isn't a starting caliber NFL QB at this point in time, this team has plenty of holes so if he thought Colt was the man for the job no way they pick Weeden there.

I'm not bashing Colt at all, I like him a lot he plays with a ton of heart but he just doesn't have the arm to be a starting NFL QB, I hope we keep him in the backup role because I think he can thrive in that role and if you need him for a few games he can do enough but I don't think he is a starting NFL QB.

*Edit - I'll add this team definitely needs a #1 WR still but I think people will be surprised how much better our receivers look this season compared to last year.
__________________
Favorite Teams:
NCAA- University of Illinois Fighting Illini
NFL- Cleveland Browns
MLB- St. Louis Cardinals
NBA- Boston Celtics
NHL- Chicago Blackhawks
CardsFan27 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 03:17 PM   #23
Senior Circuit
 
KingV2k3's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,023
Re: Browns Backers (OS Branch)

What do you guys make of this:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/88...eveland-browns

What do you think it means for Weeden?

What do you think of the return to the 34?

This threads been idle for a while...hope there's still some interest in what I believe to be one of the more interesting young teams (very possibly) on the way UP!

Thoughts?
KingV2k3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 08:03 PM   #24
Rookie
 
thefakeJTS's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Nov 2012
I preferred Wisenhunt or McDaniels over Chud
thefakeJTS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football > NFL Official Team Threads »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Top -