YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment - Page 8 - Operation Sports Forums
Home

YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

This is a discussion on YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment within the NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > NCAA Football
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2012, 07:29 PM   #71
Pro
 
Madwolf's Arena
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
PS Network: GoDeMadwolf
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Moar
Even if the Pac-1X did raid the WAC of literally every team projected to stay in the conference, that would still only leave them with 14 teams. Just saying.
Yea, that was just a guess at what they'd attempt to do. They'd have to try and get more teams than that via some others means.
Madwolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 07:38 PM   #72
Rookie
 
Td1984's Arena
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Blog Entries: 2
PS Network: Td_1984
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

I could almost see Idaho and New Mexico State jumping for joy if the Pac-12 came calling. Sure they'd be doormats, but at least they'd be in a better conference than any of the former WAC schools are in (Big Least for Boise and C-USA and Mountain West for everyone else).
__________________
NFL: Vikings
NCAA: Notre Dame, UCLA
NBA: Lakers
NHL: Minnesota North Stars (undefeated since 4/16/93), LA Kings (Champs!)
MLB: Dodgers
EPL: Manchester United
Td1984 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2012, 07:43 PM   #73
Rookie
 
T-Moar's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jul 2010
PS Network: T-Moar
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Td1984
I could almost see Idaho and New Mexico State jumping for joy if the Pac-12 came calling. Sure they'd be doormats, but at least they'd be in a better conference than any of the former WAC schools are in (Big Least for Boise and C-USA and Mountain West for everyone else).
True, better to be a doormat in the Pac-12 than the WAC.
__________________
Texans - Cougars - Astros - Rockets - Dynamo - Chelsea - Lightning
T-Moar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2012, 08:04 AM   #74
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

There is no way the Pac 12 would ever consider Idaho or NMSU. They do not have the markets or academia to qualify to be in the Mountain West, much less the Pac 12. They are more likely going to be Independents or regulated to FCS if they are left out to dry.

Also, with all the conference swapping did you notice the Pac 12 stayed pretty quite other than Texas and Oklahoma? It is because if they bring in a team, it is going to be a one with a market and the ability to create revenue. The obvious choices for them if they ever do go to 16 will be Boise St., Fresno St., San Diego St., Nevada, and UNLV. That is if they do not take another stab at the Big 12 and make a play for a Oklahoma St.

I almost choked when you said Idaho and NMSU.
Signaltheescape is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2012, 11:15 AM   #75
Pro
 
Noble Evildoer's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Arkansas
Blog Entries: 8
PS Network: FreshlySquozen
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Signaltheescape
There is no way the Pac 12 would ever consider Idaho or NMSU. They do not have the markets or academia to qualify to be in the Mountain West, much less the Pac 12. They are more likely going to be Independents or regulated to FCS if they are left out to dry.

Also, with all the conference swapping did you notice the Pac 12 stayed pretty quite other than Texas and Oklahoma? It is because if they bring in a team, it is going to be a one with a market and the ability to create revenue. The obvious choices for them if they ever do go to 16 will be Boise St., Fresno St., San Diego St., Nevada, and UNLV. That is if they do not take another stab at the Big 12 and make a play for a Oklahoma St.

I almost choked when you said Idaho and NMSU.
Yeah, none of those will be receiving a call from the Pac-12 anytime soon (probably ever). The Pac-12 doesn't really have anybody in the immediate vicinity for expansion.

I'm hoping NCAA 13 allows you to at least drop the number of teams in a conference below four. Like, maybe down to two (looking at you, WAC) or one if completely removing a conference is going to be an issue.
__________________
Red Wolves | Broncos | Cubs | Grizzlies | Blues | Liverpool FC | Sporting KC

Last edited by Noble Evildoer; 05-29-2012 at 11:21 AM.
Noble Evildoer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2012, 09:47 PM   #76
MVP
 
Ziza9Noles94's Arena
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noble Evildoer
Yeah, none of those will be receiving a call from the Pac-12 anytime soon (probably ever). The Pac-12 doesn't really have anybody in the immediate vicinity for expansion.

I'm hoping NCAA 13 allows you to at least drop the number of teams in a conference below four. Like, maybe down to two (looking at you, WAC) or one if completely removing a conference is going to be an issue.
Or at least allow us to Rename Independent and make it a real conference.
__________________
I bleed Garnet and Gold. Go Noles!

2013 NFL Draft: A school record 11 Noles selected.
Ziza9Noles94 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2012, 10:01 PM   #77
Pro
 
OVR: 19
Join Date: Jan 2006
Blog Entries: 26
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment


Instead of going to the Big East, why wouldn't Boise State be a candidate for either the Big XII or the Pac-12? Conferences really should stick to geography. Of course, everyone is going for the conference with the best media revenue stream. I've enjoyed all of the creative, historical, and competitive shuffling of the conference deck in this thread. I'm curious to see how flexible custom conferences will be in NCAA 13.

LucianoJJ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 01:06 PM   #78
Rookie
 
Altai's Arena
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
PS Network: AltaiThaKing
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madwolf
Yea, that was just a guess at what they'd attempt to do. They'd have to try and get more teams than that via some others means.
We can still get at Oklahoma, Ok St., or and TTU. The commisioner Larry Scott decided to stay at 12 after Texas' wouldn't share their revenue, But I'm pretty sure if they wanted to we could lure in the other 3 in again.
__________________
NFL: Oakland Raiders
NBA: Los Angeles Lakers
MLB: Los Angeles Dodgers
NCAA: USC Trojans
MLS: Los Angeles Galaxy
BEPL: Chelsea

Last edited by Altai; 05-31-2012 at 01:54 PM.
Altai is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 01:36 PM   #79
SMU!
 
dickey1331's Arena
 
OVR: 31
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gautier, MS
Posts: 7,842
PS Network: jeffd1331
Boise will never join the Pac 12. They don't come anywhere close to the academics. SMU has a better chance with the PAC 12 then Boise does


Do you really care where I sent this from?
__________________
RANGERS COWBOYS MAVERICKS STARS SMU UTA
2010 FIFA World Cup
dickey1331 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 04:17 PM   #80
Rookie
 
Altai's Arena
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
PS Network: AltaiThaKing
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by dickey1331
Boise will never join the Pac 12. They don't come anywhere close to the academics. SMU has a better chance with the PAC 12 then Boise does


Do you really care where I sent this from?
Honestly maybe, I mean Boise State's wrestling program is already in the PAC so if they were trying to get 16 team I could see them joining along with Texas Tech, and maybe some other Big 12, MWC, or C-USA schools.
__________________
NFL: Oakland Raiders
NBA: Los Angeles Lakers
MLB: Los Angeles Dodgers
NCAA: USC Trojans
MLS: Los Angeles Galaxy
BEPL: Chelsea
Altai is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > NCAA Football »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 AM.

Top -