YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment - Page 5 - Operation Sports Forums
Home

YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

This is a discussion on YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment within the NCAA Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > NCAA Football
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-15-2012, 02:13 AM   #41
Rookie
 
OrangeCrush22's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: May 2011
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Big East
Boston College
Connecticut
Marshall
Notre Dame
Pennsylvania State
Pittsburgh
Rutgers
Syracuse
Temple
West Virginia

Big 10
Cincinnati
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Michigan State
Minnesota
Northwestern
Ohio State
Purdue
Wisconsin

ACC

Clemson
Duke
Kentucky
Maryland
North Carolina
North Carolina State
South Carolina
Tennessee
Virginia
Virginia Tech

PAC-10
Arizona
Arizona State
California
Oregon
Oregon State
Stanford
UCLA
USC
Washington
Washington State

Big 12
Arkansas
Baylor
Oklahoma
Oklahoma State
Southern Methodist
Texas
Texas A&M
Texas Christian
Texas State
Texas Tech

SEC
Alabama
Auburn
Florida
Florida State
Georgia
Georgia Tech
Louisiana State
Miami
Mississippi
Mississippi State

MAC
Air Force
Colorado
Colorado State
Iowa
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Nebraska
Wyoming

WAC
Boise State
Brigham Young
Fresno State
Nevada
New Mexico
New Mexico State
San Diego State
Utah
Utah State
UNLV

That's what I got planned so far.

__________________
MLB: New York Yankees
NFL: Philadelphia Eagles & Buffalo Bills
NBA: New York Knicks
NCAA FB: Syracuse Orange
NCAA BB: Syracuse Orange
NCAA LX: Syracuse Orange & LeMoyne Dolphins
OrangeCrush22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Sponsors (you can remove in-post ad banners by registering or logging in)
Old 05-15-2012, 03:47 AM   #42
Rookie
 
OVR: 3
Join Date: Oct 2004
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by dickey1331
I just hope we can add teams without having to replace them.
Me too. My hope is that because they've had to increase the scheduling logic to 123, they've gone the extra mile to at least take it up to 128 (a nice number giving it's use in computing) 5 extra schools would make the WAC exits easier to replicate.
pjburrage is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2012, 07:11 AM   #43
All Star
 
dochalladay32's Arena
 
OVR: 20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delaware
PS Network: drmath0089
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Pretty sure my classic alignments from last year are still valid...

*see sig*
__________________
NCAA 12 Historical Conferences: 1937-present
PM me with any comments, suggestions, or questions you may have. There is definite room for other versions with as many teams have come and gone in FBS.
NOTE: Link will change periodically for major updates so be careful when bookmarking.
dochalladay32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2012, 10:40 PM   #44
Rookie
 
GeneralMike's Arena
 
OVR: 3
Join Date: Feb 2003
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by dochalladay32
Pretty sure my classic alignments from last year are still valid...

*see sig*
Thanks for putting those together. A great resource, and really helpful in putting together pseudo-historical alignments.

I like the idea of doing a late 80s alignment since that's when I first started watching football, but then doing some conferences that weren't officially around then but had scheduling agreements between the team and such.

Those would be the Northeastern independents (Penn State, Pitt, Temple, Rutgers, BC, WVU and Syracuse, and then maybe throw in UConn and UMass as cannon fodder) and the old Metro conference (Cincy, Memphis, Louisville, Tulane, FSU, Va Tech, Southern Miss and South Carolina). I was also reading about a proposed Super Metro conference which would have been basically those 15 teams and Miami in 2 divisions. The dynamic conference prestige should help these leagues out if they implement it properly.
GeneralMike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 08:24 AM   #45
All Star
 
dochalladay32's Arena
 
OVR: 20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delaware
PS Network: drmath0089
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneralMike
Thanks for putting those together. A great resource, and really helpful in putting together pseudo-historical alignments.

I like the idea of doing a late 80s alignment since that's when I first started watching football, but then doing some conferences that weren't officially around then but had scheduling agreements between the team and such.

Those would be the Northeastern independents (Penn State, Pitt, Temple, Rutgers, BC, WVU and Syracuse, and then maybe throw in UConn and UMass as cannon fodder) and the old Metro conference (Cincy, Memphis, Louisville, Tulane, FSU, Va Tech, Southern Miss and South Carolina). I was also reading about a proposed Super Metro conference which would have been basically those 15 teams and Miami in 2 divisions. The dynamic conference prestige should help these leagues out if they implement it properly.
Probably needs work with the additional 3 teams, but that is minor compared to the initial project. And if there is the same 12 team replacement, wouldn't change much.
__________________
NCAA 12 Historical Conferences: 1937-present
PM me with any comments, suggestions, or questions you may have. There is definite room for other versions with as many teams have come and gone in FBS.
NOTE: Link will change periodically for major updates so be careful when bookmarking.
dochalladay32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2012, 10:29 AM   #46
Rookie
 
esayem's Arena
 
OVR: 3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

How about the early 90's proposed Metro SuperConference:

North
Boston College
Syracuse
Rutgers
Temple
Pittsburgh
West Virginia
Cincinnati
Louisville

South
Miami
South Carolina
Virginia Tech
East Carolina
Florida State
Tulane
Southern Mississippi
Memphis
esayem is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 06:49 PM   #47
Rookie
 
wkukicksbutt's Arena
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: May 2008
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Another Custom Conference possibility:

First, I ranked all the teams by the number of wins that they have in the past 4 years(08-11). For Ohio State fans, if you have vacated victories, those numbers don't count. So if NCAA 13 DID have violations, then teams would be penalized in the future, but more on that a bit later. So I ranked the teams by the number of wins they have, and then by the number of losses they have. Then, if they are still tied, then rank them by their most recent season until the tiebreaker is broken. Conference 1 has teams ranked 1-12. Conference 2 has teams ranked 13-24, and etc. There is 8 12-team conferences and 3 9-team conferences. I would rerank these every 4 years.

Conference 1
1 Boise St
2 Alabama
3 TCU
4 Oregon
5 Oklahoma
6 Virginia Tech
7 Oklahoma St
8 Utah
9 LSU
10 Florida
11 USC
12 Wisconsin

Conference 2
13 BYU
14 Penn St
15 Texas
16 Nebraska
17 West Virginia
18 Cincinnati
19 Michigan St
20 Stanford
21 Houston
22 Missouri
23 Auburn
24 Iowa

Conference 3
25 Florida St
26 Nevada
27 Northern Illinois
28 Arkansas
29 Tulsa
30 Southern Miss
31 South Carolina
32 Georgia
33 Georgia Tech
34 Texas Tech
35 Pittsburgh
36 Air Force

Conference 4
37 Navy
38 Clemson
39 Temple
40 North Carolina
41 Ohio
42 Rutgers
43 Northwestern
44 Notre Dame
45 California
46 Miami(FL)
47 UConn
48 South Florida

Conference 5
49 East Carolina
50 Hawaii
51 Kansas St
52 NC State
53 UCF
54 Troy
55 Boston College
56 Ohio St
57 Western Michigan
58 Arizona
59 Fresno St
60 Michigan

Conference 6
61 Texas A&M
62 Central Michigan
63 Baylor
64 Toledo
65 Louisiana Tech
66 Mississippi St
67 Oregon St
68 Kentucky
69 Arkansas St
70 Louisiana-Lafayette
71 Ball St
72 Ole Miss

Conference 7
73 SMU
74 San Diego St
75 FIU
76 Louisville
77 Marshall
78 Tennessee
79 Middle Tennessee
80 Wyoming
81 Illinois
82 Wake Forest
83 Arizona St
84 Maryland

Conference 8
85 UCLA
86 Virginia
87 Purdue
88 Syracuse
89 UTEP
90 Bowling Green
91 Rice
92 Iowa St
93 Kent
94 Louisiana-Monroe
95 Washington
96 Minnesota

Conference 9
97 Utah St
98 Army
99 Kansas
100 Buffalo
101 Idaho
102 FAU
103 Vanderbilt
104 Miami(OH)
105 UAB

Conference 10
106 Colorado St
107 Colorado
108 Duke
109 San Jose St
110 UNLV
111 Indiana
112 New Mexico St
113 Western Kentucky
114 Eastern Michigan

Conference 11
115 North Texas
116 Memphis
117 Tulane
118 Akron
119 Washington St
120 New Mexico
121 Texas State
122 UMass
123 UTSA
wkukicksbutt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 08:44 PM   #48
Pro
 
Madwolf's Arena
 
OVR: 9
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
PS Network: GoDeMadwolf
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Move Louisville and FSU to the Big12, then figure out the rest.
Madwolf is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 11:45 PM   #49
Rookie
 
T-Moar's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jul 2010
PS Network: T-Moar
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

I finally got around to making that pure geographic realignment I was talking about. Here it is, for the people that want to use it.
Disclaimer: It's not my best work. I made sure that there are NO independents, though. And all of the conferences' names are much improved, IMO.

Lone Star Conference (WAC)
Championship Game: Cowboys Stadium

Mirabeau B. Lamar Division
Texas
UTEP
Texas Tech
UTSA
North Texas
TCU

Sam Houston Division
Texas A&M
Houston
Rice
Baylor
SMU
Texas State

Protected Rivals:
Texas - Texas A&M
Baylor - Texas Tech
Houston - UTEP
Texas State - UTSA
SMU - TCU
Rice - North Texas

Four Corners Conference (MWC)


Colorado
Colorado State
Air Force
New Mexico
New Mexico State
Arizona
Arizona State
BYU
Utah
Utah State

Golden Gate Conference (Pac-12)


USC
California
San Jose State
San Diego State
UCLA
Fresno State
Stanford
UNLV
Nevada
Hawai'i

Conference 54-40 (C-USA)


Oregon
Oregon State
Boise State
Idaho
Washington
Washington state
Wyoming
Wisconsin
Minnesota

Mississippi River Conference (SEC)


Louisiana Tech
LSU
Tulane
Southern Miss
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
UL-Monroe
UL-Lafayette
Arkansas
Arkansas State

Dust Bowl Conference (Big XII)


Oklahoma State
Tulsa
Kansas
Kansas State
Missouri
Nebraska
Oklahoma
Iowa
Iowa State

Colonial South Conference (ACC)
Championship Game: Bank of America Stadium

Tobacco Road Division
North Carolina
Duke
NC State
Wake Forest
East Carolina
South Carolina
Clemson

Deep South Division
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Georgia
Georgia Tech
Marshall
West Virginia

Independence League (Big East)
Championship Game: Lincoln Financial Field

John Adams Division
Navy
Connecticut
Maryland
Rutgers
UMass
Boston College

Ben Franklin Division
Syracuse
Army
Penn State
Pittsburgh
Temple
Buffalo

Protected Rivals:
Army - Navy
Syracuse - Rutgers
Penn State - Maryland
Buffalo - UMass
Boston College - Temple
Pittsburgh - Connecticut

Graceland Conference
Championship Game: Liberty Bowl

Rock N' Roll Division
Tennessee
Middle Tennessee State
Vanderbilt
UAB
Alabama
Auburn
Troy
Memphis

Bluegrass Division
Ball State
Kentucky
Louisville
Western Kentucky
Notre Dame
Indiana
Purdue

Protected Rivals:
Tennessee - Kentucky
Alabama - Notre Dame
UAB - Louisville
Vanderbilt - Northwestern
Middle Tennessee State - WKU
Troy - Ball State
Auburn - Indiana

Great Lakes Conference (Big Ten)
Championship Game: Home Field

Ohio Division
Ohio State
Ohio
Toledo
Akron
Cincinnati
Miami (OH)
Kent State
Bowling Green

Michigan Division
Michigan State
Michigan
Central Michigan
Eastern Michigan
Western Michigan
Illinois
Northwestern
Northern Illinois

Protected Rivals:
Michigan - Ohio State
Northern Illinois - Toledo
Michigan State - Cincinnati

Sunshine Conference (Sun Belt)


Florida
Miami (FL)
Florida State
Central Florida
South Florida
Florida International
Florida Atlantic
__________________
Texans - Cougars - Astros - Rockets - Dynamo - Chelsea - Lightning
T-Moar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 04:47 PM   #50
Rookie
 
bwburke94's Arena
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Mar 2009
Re: YOUR plans for Conference Re-Alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by wkukicksbutt
Another Custom Conference possibility:

First, I ranked all the teams by the number of wins that they have in the past 4 years(08-11). For Ohio State fans, if you have vacated victories, those numbers don't count. So if NCAA 13 DID have violations, then teams would be penalized in the future, but more on that a bit later. So I ranked the teams by the number of wins they have, and then by the number of losses they have. Then, if they are still tied, then rank them by their most recent season until the tiebreaker is broken. Conference 1 has teams ranked 1-12. Conference 2 has teams ranked 13-24, and etc. There is 8 12-team conferences and 3 9-team conferences. I would rerank these every 4 years.

Conference 1
1 Boise St
2 Alabama
3 TCU
4 Oregon
5 Oklahoma
6 Virginia Tech
7 Oklahoma St
8 Utah
9 LSU
10 Florida
11 USC
12 Wisconsin

Conference 2
13 BYU
14 Penn St
15 Texas
16 Nebraska
17 West Virginia
18 Cincinnati
19 Michigan St
20 Stanford
21 Houston
22 Missouri
23 Auburn
24 Iowa

Conference 3
25 Florida St
26 Nevada
27 Northern Illinois
28 Arkansas
29 Tulsa
30 Southern Miss
31 South Carolina
32 Georgia
33 Georgia Tech
34 Texas Tech
35 Pittsburgh
36 Air Force

Conference 4
37 Navy
38 Clemson
39 Temple
40 North Carolina
41 Ohio
42 Rutgers
43 Northwestern
44 Notre Dame
45 California
46 Miami(FL)
47 UConn
48 South Florida

Conference 5
49 East Carolina
50 Hawaii
51 Kansas St
52 NC State
53 UCF
54 Troy
55 Boston College
56 Ohio St
57 Western Michigan
58 Arizona
59 Fresno St
60 Michigan

Conference 6
61 Texas A&M
62 Central Michigan
63 Baylor
64 Toledo
65 Louisiana Tech
66 Mississippi St
67 Oregon St
68 Kentucky
69 Arkansas St
70 Louisiana-Lafayette
71 Ball St
72 Ole Miss

Conference 7
73 SMU
74 San Diego St
75 FIU
76 Louisville
77 Marshall
78 Tennessee
79 Middle Tennessee
80 Wyoming
81 Illinois
82 Wake Forest
83 Arizona St
84 Maryland

Conference 8
85 UCLA
86 Virginia
87 Purdue
88 Syracuse
89 UTEP
90 Bowling Green
91 Rice
92 Iowa St
93 Kent
94 Louisiana-Monroe
95 Washington
96 Minnesota

Conference 9
97 Utah St
98 Army
99 Kansas
100 Buffalo
101 Idaho
102 FAU
103 Vanderbilt
104 Miami(OH)
105 UAB

Conference 10
106 Colorado St
107 Colorado
108 Duke
109 San Jose St
110 UNLV
111 Indiana
112 New Mexico St
113 Western Kentucky
114 Eastern Michigan

Conference 11
115 North Texas
116 Memphis
117 Tulane
118 Akron
119 Washington St
120 New Mexico
121 Texas State
122 UMass
123 UTSA
I'd penalize Ohio State for the violations, but I'd move them down one conference instead of three. Also, conferences 9-11 should be cut down to 8 members to allow TSU/UMass/UTSA to be independent due to their transition status.
__________________
UMass football in 1913: 4-3, outscored opponents 96-41
UMass football in 1963: 8-0-1, outscored opponents 265-12
UMass football in 2013: To Be Determined

bwburke94 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > NCAA Football »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Top -