The sliders that are reversed are:

[rascocm]

[quote=mudtiger;2038506249]HUM QBA actually is CPU QBA



HUMAN QBA controls the CPU QBA. I don't think it controls both, but I could be wrong. Also, try turning CPU PB to 100, and CPU RB to 0, along with HUM RB at 100, and HUM RBA at 100, and then judge your running game and the CPUs.

[therizing02]

[mudtiger]

[quote=rascocm;2038506275]

Quote: Originally Posted by mudtiger

HUM QBA actually is CPU QBA HUMAN QBA controls the CPU QBA. I don't think it controls both, but I could be wrong. Also, try turning CPU PB to 100, and CPU RB to 0, along with HUM RB at 100, and HUM RBA at 100, and then judge your running game and the CPUs.

I had cpu pb at 100, didn't do a thing to human rb. Plus no way is human wrc at 100 = human qba of 0. I'd have to play more with the rest. The others I might be willing to believe something funky is going on.

[ChuckMonts]

I don't think your ideas about CPU RB affecting Human RBA are correct. Nor do I think Human WR Catching at 100 = Human QB Accuracy.

I do however beleive that Human QB Acc works as intended for human but also affects CPU QB Acc. Another one is Human Running Back Ability which works as intended on Human RBs but also affects CPU Running Back.

These are the only two that I am sure about. An easy way too see if thing are affecting both teams would be to raise the all human sliders to 100 and lower all CPU to 0 and play even teams. I will try this tomor but for now it's bed time for me.

[adembroski]

Sooooo...

Lemme get this straight...

All the tuning stuff WORKS, but they're assigned to the wrong slider?

Is there a chance Human Interceptions is tied to CPU Punting Distance?

[rascocm]

By the way, I tested all of these on Varsity. the hardest ones to figure out were what actually affects the human rbs ability. Hell, maybe it is on defense. I do know when I put Human WR at 100, my QB started throwing very crappy. I did the HUM RB based on run pressure and lock-ups (hit replay on several setting and slow-moed the lines interacting).

[bad_philanthropy]

Whoa, I think the op is right about at least one thing. CPU RBA might just be CPU Pass Block. I noticed it had gotten ever more difficult to get any pressure after I boosted the CPU run sliders. I just tested this theory and maybe someone can try as well.

I had the CPU RBA at 75 I went into practice with Oregon as the defense I chose standard 4-3 Cover 1 and for the offense I had them use the play Shotgun Normal Wing TE Four Verticals. The difference was night and day. When I moved CPU RBA down to zero I suddenly had a very good pass rush with good pressure. It wasn't just about sacks but I was moving the o-line back. Still not perfect but I definitely feel like it was improved.

I think we are all on to something here.

[pjv31]

Well I lowered the human qb accuracy to 20. and the whatever one was supposed to effect the cpu pass block. I AM GETTING PRESSURE. 2 sack and 4 hurries in the first half. And I am not seeing my Dline getting pancaked anymore.

UPDATE: Just got a user sack on a ss blitz. My whole dline just blew up the oline, This is awesome

Just finished the game. Fresno QB 17-28-135-0-1

Had 3 sacks. I really think this works guys.

[Joshinji]

While I would say that the CPU QB has been a tad less accurate, it's the same as last years game though, by putting the HUM QBA at 0 has given me the ability to throw the ball 10 yards. Also putting CPU QBA to 100 has made no difference for me.

I haven't been able to penetrate the line still even though I put CPU RBA at 0, although have gotten 2 sacks from the QB trying to run after finding no receivers, which honestly I think is because I'm playing a 3-4 and with the extra LB back there maybe that's doing something to disrupt the over the middle stuff.

I dunno, I'm open for any more ideas.

[ChicagoSparty]

Okay, I just played a couple quarters as MSU against ND. Jimmy Clausen is rated pretty average in the game. Here is what I did.

Started with HUM QBA at 0 and CPU QBA at 100. Clausen goes 4-9 with 2 interceptions. A couple lame duck throws, nothing with any zing even if on target.

Changed it to HUM QBA at 100 and CPU QBA at 0. Clausen goes 8 for his next 9, with a couple scores. Precision passes.

Changed it back to 0/100. Clausen goes 5 for his final 11 with 3 interceptions. One ball looked like a kick. Even the ones he completed were way off line and it basically was a race to the ball.

Every other slider remained at 50, on AA. I'd say those results are pretty telling, and strongly indicate that HUM QBA affects both HUM and CPU (MSU's Hoyer did about as well). I did notice increased pressure on Clausen, as others have noted.