All Uniforms in NCAA Football 09

[Adam_Thompson_EA]

Quote: Originally Posted by jdrhammer

My team, Ole Miss, only has one alt. and I'm glad it made it in by the way, but I see what you're saying. I know the black uni's are cool to a lot of people, but I'd rather have seen Vandy get an all black set since black is their primary color rather than FSU, who has the all garnett in the game. I know Adam is getting hit hard because there is no way he can "please everyone" with the budget he has. I don't mean to insult anyone, but I'm still shocked that UTEP and Nevada have alternates in the game when there are BCS schools that are left out. No harm, no foul.

UTEP and Nevada got alts because they had a second home jersey (as opposed to teams that just swap the pants to make alts). Vanderbilt didn't get an alt because they have new uniforms this year, and they only sent me one jersey (I think the gold, but I'm not at work so I don't know for sure).

I had pretty good reasons for leaving out any BCS schools I did.

[Adam_Thompson_EA]

Quote: Originally Posted by Solidice

Speaking of Nevada, I don't know if the wrong picture was put up at the EA site, or if the way the lighting was "hitting" the uniform but the silver looks kind a light. I don't really know much about Nevada, so I don't know if this is considered a home or away alternate.

Yes, that is the silver jersey (check out the white drop shadow on the number). And yes, the lighting does blow it out. It used to be worse so we darkened it a bit to compensate for the lighting.

[Adam_Thompson_EA]

Quote: Originally Posted by mojo7877

OMT, Is there any chance Georgia Tech's new uniforms and combinations made it into the game? I believe they are wearing white shirts with gold pants at home now with the uni having a different look.

No, they have the uniforms they wore last year. Sorry.

[Solidice]

Quote: Originally Posted by OMT

Right. We won't have to scrap these since there is no way we are changing player models again! IF I can get the green light on mix and match uniforms, then I think we can add maybe 5 jerseys and 10 pants next year (plus changing anything that has changed in real life of course, like Minnesota and UAB's new uniforms) and we will be 100% complete on FBS alternates, including ones that teams don't wear!

I would give you the green light for the mix-n-match uniforms.

sounds like it would be easier on the art department if it was(i have no idea how long it would take to make that feature). like Texas Tech, instead of making 4 more alternates to get the all the combos they wore last few years, you would be done since you already have the red/black/white jerseys and pants. could even bring back the red/black they wore 3-4 years ago.

[2krules]

Quote: Originally Posted by OMT

What teams were shorted alternates? I know I missed the silver A&M pants, that was an oversight on my part. But none of the teams that didn't get an alternate are very popular or have anything interesting. UTEP got alts cause they have an orange alternate jersey. Marshall didn't get alts because they are just mix and match. So let me know who you think shouldn't have gotten shorted and why?

I honestly wasn't expecting the silver pants this year; it's only the second year they've had them, and would be easy to miss.

But Texas A&M has worn maroon on maroon and white on white for several years. They wear maroon on maroon at least two times a year, and some years, three. They are very popular amongst the A&M students. You guys even had them in your game until last year, when you had no alts at all.

The idea of limiting the alts to "non-mix and match" teams would be fine if all the other teams each only got one set of alts. But you had some alt choices left over. Instead of giving extra alts to teams that already had a set of alts, why didn't you spread the alt love around a little bit more and make some more college's fans a little happy by giving them a set?

[GoldSox]

Do any of the teams have alternate helmets? Other than the obvious teams, like Oregon. GT has a new white helmet that they will start wearing at times this year.

[Adam_Thompson_EA]

Quote: Originally Posted by 2krules

I honestly wasn't expecting the silver pants this year; it's only the second year they've had them, and would be easy to miss. But Texas A&M has worn maroon on maroon and white on white for several years. They wear maroon on maroon at least two times a year, and some years, three. They are very popular amongst the A&M students. You guys even had them in your game until last year, when you had no alts at all. The idea of limiting the alts to "non-mix and match" teams would be fine if all the other teams each only got one set of alts. But you had some alt choices left over. Instead of giving extra alts to teams that already had a set of alts, why didn't you spread the alt love around a little bit more and make some more college's fans a little happy by giving them a set?

I just don't have any reference of them wearing all maroon last season when they switched to Adidas. Sorry.

[2krules]

Quote: Originally Posted by OMT

I just don't have any reference of them wearing all maroon last season when they switched to Adidas. Sorry.

They did wear them, but I can accept that with all the unform you need to do you could miss that. Thanks, I'm done complaining about it now.

[deltroy]

I guess no green on green for mich st

[babyfat9]

Yeah i'd like to see Miami's Green on Green as well !!!!