MLB 12 The Show Video - Marlins Park

[Joey]

It wasn't directed at anyone in particular. I know you make far too many positive comments to not enjoy the game!

Quote: Originally Posted by Blzer

I didn't know if you were referring to me by the way, but I have been called out for being a little too harsh to seemingly enjoy gaming. Just like you, people here don't know me; those who do (and I've met a share of OSers before) can vouch for my... how do you say... "normalness" in person? Besides, I have yet to complain about the Reyes thing, if you look over my posts carefully. I've mentioned what probably shouldn't happen, but I wasn't the person who brought it up. All I didn't like was that the "old build" comment sometimes doesn't come into fruition even though they say that. However, at the same time, I'm really hoping that this is just a matter of being an "old build" and that they're right. Obviously, nothing would make me happier. And of course, even if it didn't, I would still love this game till the end. EDIT: Wow, that first bit rhymed.

[jmik58]

Did Reyes just get jammed on an inside fastball and hit an opposite field homerun?

I thought the new ball physics was supposed to fix that.

And for anyone questioning whether it was a HR...look at the left fielder drop step and run deep towards the pole.

1. If it wasn't a HR, why did they show it right before the HR feature?
2. If it wasn't a HR, why is it so close to a HR? That ball should not be hit that deep to the opposite field regardless of whether it cleared the wall or not.

[CMH]

You guys should really start reading posts. It's like a broken record in here and it's annoying.

[jmik58]

Quote: Originally Posted by CMH

You guys should really start reading posts. It's like a broken record in here and it's annoying.

I don't have time to read through 14 pages of posts. However, your response has alerted me to the fact I'm opening a wound that was perhaps nearly closed. Therefore, I won't advance the discussion further.

[M_F_Z]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmik58

I don't have time to read through 14 pages of posts. However, your response has alerted me to the fact I'm opening a wound that was perhaps nearly closed. Therefore, I won't advance the discussion further.

You don't have the time to read through 14 pages of posts ? Then why are you here ? That's what forums are for - reading. They're not one sided for you just to post.

You don't have time or you're just too lazy to read ?

[K_GUN]

Quote: Originally Posted by M_F_Z

You don't have the time to read through 14 pages of posts ? Then why are you here ? That's what forums are for - reading. They're not one sided for you just to post. You don't have time or you're just too lazy to read ?

I'm going with time.....some guys have 9 hours/day to spend on OS...others, just 9 minutes/day.

[Perfect Zero]

Quote: Originally Posted by K_GUN

I'm going with time.....some guys have 9 hours/day to spend on OS...others, just 9 minutes/day.

But you have to read the posts in order to debate. It's not that hard to click on the little button beside the topic title and read from the last post that you read before.

[myghty]

[nomo17k]

Quote: Originally Posted by K_GUN

I'm going with time.....some guys have 9 hours/day to spend on OS...others, just 9 minutes/day.

Right... some people aren't as unlucky as myself working in front of computer all day long to work and check OS frequently...

While I wouldn't blame people to not thoroughly read all the posts, when you post something, I feel you should at least do *some* homework before you actually do so...

otherwise, you don't need to post yourself, since the chances are that your point has been discussed already by others, you are not putting a tiny extra effort (search? or ...read at least a few posts?) to join the ongoing discussion.

[CMH]

All right, my bad. I tried making a moderation comment and I think I started something. Not my intention.

Let's go back on topic, please.