All Ratings Talk Here Per Millennium

[Scott]

Quote: Originally Posted by fourthreemafia

These ratings are still absolutely terrible.

What makes you qualified to assess that?

[jmalu84]

man i still think timmons deserves to be higher but who am i to judge...as a 2nd stringer behind larry foote here are his numbers, what do you guys think?

SPLIT	TOT	SOLO	AST	SACK	STF	STFY	FF	BK	INT	YDS	AVG	LNG	TD	PD
2008	65	43	22	5.0	2	6	1	0	1	89	89.0	89	0	3

[OakKyd]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmalu84

man i still think timmons deserves to be higher but who am i to judge...as a 2nd stringer behind larry foote here are his numbers, what do you guys think? SPLIT TOT SOLO AST SACK STF STFY FF BK INT YDS AVG LNG TD PD 2008 65 43 22 5.0 2 6 1 0 1 89 89.0 89 0 3

i think mcgahees acc should be higher
and ray rices speed
and ed reeds play recognition

[jmalu84]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmalu84

man i still think timmons deserves to be higher but who am i to judge...as a 2nd stringer behind larry foote here are his numbers, what do you guys think? SPLIT TOT SOLO AST SACK STF STFY FF BK INT YDS AVG LNG TD PD 2008 65 43 22 5.0 2 6 1 0 1 89 89.0 89 0 3

just for comparison, here are larry footes numbers...larry is rated 78 overall by madden and timmons 74, steeler fans should recognize this injustice

SPLIT	TOT	SOLO	AST	SACK	STF	STFY	FF	BK	INT	YDS	AVG	LNG	TD	PD
2008	63	34	29	1.5	2	2	1	0	0	0	0.0	0	0	3

[jmalu84]

Quote: Originally Posted by OakKyd

i think mcgahees acc should be higher and ray rices speed and ed reeds play recognition

as a steeler fan it burns me to say this but...i agree with you...ray rice has plenty of upside and ed reed, what more can be said, mcgahee, i wonder if he still thinks about that ryan clark hit

[Scott]

Before you criticize the ratings, how bout you play with them how they are first...

[jmalu84]

Quote: Originally Posted by Scott

Before you criticize the ratings, how bout you play with them how they are first...

im not complaining...im providing evidence to backup my thoughts...how bout you take constructive criticism as it should be...why else would such a thread exist other than to discuss ratings? look at the numbers...

[Scott]

Quote: Originally Posted by jmalu84

im not complaining...im providing evidence to backup my thoughts...how bout you take constructive criticism as it should be...why else would such a thread exist other than to discuss ratings? look at the numbers...

All I'm saying is everyone's ratings have been lowered, perhaps theres a method to the madness....

[jmalu84]

Quote: Originally Posted by Scott

All I'm saying is everyone's ratings have been lowered, perhaps theres a method to the madness....

all i am saying is if we look strictly at the numbers then it is clear that timmons outplayed foote...plus he is younger...i was just providing some discussion to this thread, thats all, ill respect your thoughts and end this discussion, good day sir...

[fourthreemafia]

Quote: Originally Posted by Scott

What makes you qualified to assess that?

Seeing the ratings of some of these players in comparison to others. Alot of them are a complete joke.

I never said anything about how the ratings actually work in the game. Thats something you have to play to make a judgment call on.