a few days ago i began working on a 09-10 roster set for NFL 2K5. i did not purchase Madden 2010 after watching Apex video reviews. and i infact played it at BestBuy the day it came out.
but to the point, this isnt about Madden - its about my roster.
i tried to post all my QB player ratings but i got an error when i clicked send so i am only posting a few QB ratings. i am working on every single QB (except free agents)
i used scouting reports, draft analysis, and youtube videos to determine approximate player attributes. yell at me if u see one wrong.
[Reply]
The first team is completed, the Carolina Panthers. Using combine and draft analysis for attributes the players are very accurate. Using Jamd, everyones attire and facemasks are approximate.
88 offense, 90 defense, 91 Overall... not bad for a team that was 12-4 number 2 in the NFC last year.
The Browns were started on, got Brady Quinn's facemask close enough to the one he wears.
once i complete the Browns i will post the PSV file on here (sorry Xboxers) and sort've give you guys a 'demo'.
[Reply]
Originally Posted by 2Koalition: The first team is completed, the Carolina Panthers. Using combine and draft analysis for attributes the players are very accurate. Using Jamd, everyones attire and facemasks are approximate.
88 offense, 90 defense, 91 Overall... not bad for a team that was 12-4 number 2 in the NFC last year.
The Browns were started on, got Brady Quinn's facemask close enough to the one he wears.
once i complete the Browns i will post the PSV file on here (sorry Xboxers) and sort've give you guys a 'demo'.
Ha! I thought the "2Koalition" bit sounded familiar...now this seals it. Good luck with your work though, bud!
[Reply]
2Koalition 12:25 AM 08-27-2009
The two teams (Browns and Panthers) are finally finished - very hectic trying to browse the internet since they closed down NFLdraftscout website so finding combine statistics and analysis wasn't easy.
I'd say a lot of the ratings are very accurately and true to the player. Apparel is as close as it can get using Jamd. I am going to fix some birthdates and do some touch ups and I'll drop the file in the board.
Panthers (12-4)
88 offense
91 defense
91 overall
Browns (4-12)
79 offense
81 defense
82 overall
one other thing, select a team that has a 3-4 defense (Cowboys, Ravens, Patriots etc) if you play/use the Browns.
[Reply]
2Koalition 04:03 AM 08-27-2009
And here it is, the 'demo' - the Browns and Panthers are the only two teams complete (except the Kickers and Punters for now) and some stats need to still be cleared.
I read through dozens of scout analysis reports to make the ratings as close as possible, also used Madden 2010 on the PSP as a little assistant for determining the ratings (for those who I did not find a report on)
If you're not happy with a player's overall, just yell at me and I'll back it up.
[Reply]
2Koalition 01:02 PM 08-27-2009
Franchise File: will be released by October, hopefully
Two down, thirty to go. Trying to make the roster as realistical as possible, also making it uniform with the Generated Draft.
I still learning how to make the Franchise files, I googled the steps and I am thinking of making two different kinds. The season will be near over by then, but just know that my 2K11 file would have better time since I don't have to start from scratch like I am doing with this 2K10 file.
But two different Franchise files, i am calling the one Standard and the other one Premium.
basically Standard is just the regular Franchise that you would start in a game, and Premium is going to be a Franchise with the teams having their specific draft picks. (i.e. Carolina traded their 1st round pick in the Draft so when you finish the year, they wont have it unless you make a few moves and trade for a 1st round pick)
I never ever made a Franchise file before and the scheduling looks pretty deep, but I will get around to it. Any ideas on this would be most appreciated, just want to put Madden 10 to shame.
ALSO: yes, you can use a draft class, if i figure out how to make it i will add that into the set
[Reply]