Top Undefeated Teams of the Decade?

[ZB9]

Quote: Originally Posted by WatsonTiger

Talent doesn't matter. The team with the most talent doesn't always win. 01 Miami was VERY good, but imo 04 AU was the best team i've seen this decade.

talent matters obviously, but great college talent can be different than NFL talent

Some players and schemes dont translate to the NFL...'95 Nebraska for example and other option teams

[Cebby]

Quote: Originally Posted by ZB9

College football needs to hurry up and get here.

Completely disagree

I'd much rather discuss Jason Campbell, Caddy, Ronnie Brown, Marcus McNeil, and Carlos Rogers than anyone Auburn has in 2009.

[ZB9]

Quote: Originally Posted by Cebby

Even if it was, Auburn and Texas had an equal number of NFL players, and Auburn at least has a few good ones.

true nuff

Quote: Originally Posted by Cebby

Completely disagree I'd much rather discuss Jason Campbell, Caddy, Ronnie Brown, Marcus McNeil, and Carlos Rogers than anyone Auburn has in 2009.

LOL I can understand that

[WatsonTiger]

Quote: Originally Posted by ZB9

College football needs to hurry up and get here.

<-------

[BigDofBA]

Quote: Originally Posted by WatsonTiger

imo 04 AU was the best team i've seen this decade.

Were you drunk the whole decade?

Quote: Originally Posted by WatsonTiger

Talent doesn't matter.

LOL. That's just funny. Talent matters a great deal.

The more talented team wins a large percentage of the time.

[ZB9]

Quote: Originally Posted by WatsonTiger

<-------

Ha I feel you my fellow CFB junkie

[ZB9]

Quote: Originally Posted by BigDofBA

Were you drunk the whole decade?

Auburn has as good a case in this discussion as anyone outside of '01 Miami imo

of course they didnt get a shot to win the MNC because 0U got the benefit of the doubt (some things never change)...but I seriously doubt the Tigers would have gotten massacred like the sooners did. It most certainly would have been a better game imo. Maybe the Tigers would have won?

Quote:

LOL. That's just funny. Talent matters a great deal. The more talented team wins a large percentage of the time.

yesir of course it does, but you can have great talent in college without it being translatable to the NFL. ie Jameel Holloway, Tommy Frazier...the "tweener" type of defensive ends, linebackers, "rovers" and safeties, etc..

btw '04 Auburn probably had more NFL talent than '04 0U as well as '00 0U. That alone doesnt necessarily make the Tigers better than '00 0U, but I think they were for other reasons

[auburntigersfan]

'04 Auburn was one hell of a team that didn't have a problem with one team on their schedule. We'll never know where they would rank on this list because they never even got a chance to play the other top team from the same year, much less other top teams from this past decade.

[Sportsforever]

Quote: Originally Posted by auburntigersfan

'04 Auburn was one hell of a team that didn't have a problem with one team on their schedule. We'll never know where they would rank on this list because they never even got a chance to play the other top team from the same year, much less other top teams from this past decade.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/playby...20002&period=4

Did you forget about this game?

[Cebby]

Quote: Originally Posted by Sportsforever

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/playby...20002&period=4 Did you forget about this game?

That was the only game of the season that a team had the opportunity to tie or take the lead in the fourth quarter. That puts them behind the 1995 Nebraska team and...well, that's it in that regard.