Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008?

MassNole · 01-03-2009, 12:40 AM

Discuss

Olson-for-Heisman · 01-03-2009, 12:54 AM

2008 Utah beat MUCH better teams. I'd choose them.

Cletus · 01-03-2009, 12:59 AM

2004 Utah was the better team. If it weren't for the 2004 team Utah most likely would not have had the respect from pollsters and ended up in a BCS game.

superjames1992 · 01-03-2009, 02:11 AM

2008's Utah team. 2004's team crushed Pittsburgh 35-7 in the Fiesta Bowl, but I think it's safe to say that Pittsburgh was the worst team to ever play in a BCS bowl. That Pitt team just wasn't very good.

BigDofBA · 01-03-2009, 02:13 AM

2004 Utah was the better team but 208 Utah had a better resume.

Cebby · 01-03-2009, 02:16 AM

The big problem with the 2004 team is they didn't get to play anyone. This is especially irritating since it had probably the best BCS crop of the series aside from Pitt. I personally would go 2004, but either one was pretty damn good.

pennstlbu · 01-03-2009, 02:16 AM

2004 had the better offense, 2008 the better defense. 2008 overall.

pfunk880 · 01-03-2009, 02:45 AM

Krodis · 01-03-2009, 05:52 AM

2008 has the better resume, but that 2004 team was absurd. They obliterated everyone they played. I really think 2004 Utah is one of the best 5 or 10 teams this decade.

bkrich83 · 01-03-2009, 03:44 PM

Absolutely the 2004 team. It's not even close. They were better on defense, and had better skill players on offense.

The 2008 team has a better resume, but the 2004 team was more talented.

View Poll Results: Better Ute?
2004 Utes	7	30.43%
2008 Utes	16	69.57%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

01-03-2009, 12:40 AM	#1 (permalink)
MassNole The Eskimo Spy Ferret OVR: 62 Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: In a state of paranoia Posts: 15,653	Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008? Discuss __________________ Where Will MassNole's Stumbles Take You Today? Updated August 18th

01-03-2009, 12:54 AM	#2 (permalink)
Olson-for-Heisman All Star OVR: 22 Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: California Posts: 5,711	Re: Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008? 2008 Utah beat MUCH better teams. I'd choose them. __________________ I approve this message.

01-03-2009, 12:59 AM	#3 (permalink)
Cletus Pro OVR: 12 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Greenville, SC Posts: 603	Re: Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008? 2004 Utah was the better team. If it weren't for the 2004 team Utah most likely would not have had the respect from pollsters and ended up in a BCS game.

01-03-2009, 02:13 AM	#5 (permalink)
BigDofBA 2-3 OVR: 21 Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma Posts: 6,045	Re: Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008? 2004 Utah was the better team but 208 Utah had a better resume. __________________ *My Teams* NCAA - Oklahoma Sooners MLB - St. Louis Cardinals NFL - Dallas Cowboys NBA - Oklahoma City Thunder

01-03-2009, 02:16 AM	#7 (permalink)
pennstlbu Pro OVR: 8 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 942	Re: Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008? 2004 had the better offense, 2008 the better defense. 2008 overall. __________________ "You should only drink to enhance your social skills." -Barney Gumble http://www.myspace.com/silentassassin37

01-03-2009, 02:45 AM	#8 (permalink)
pfunk880 It's Football Season OVR: 32 Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 4,730	Re: Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008? 2008 __________________ Green Bay Packers \| Milwaukee Brewers \| Bradley Braves \| Wisconsin Badgers Marquette Golden Eagles \| Milwaukee Bucks \| Milwaukee Panthers

01-03-2009, 05:52 AM	#9 (permalink)
Krodis Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 256	Re: Better Utah team, 2004 or 2008? 2008 has the better resume, but that 2004 team was absurd. They obliterated everyone they played. I really think 2004 Utah is one of the best 5 or 10 teams this decade.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode