Official "Which Roster Do We Start With? Poll

[RedZoneD25]

Above are the options for starting the league. Please vote honestly to what you'd like, and not just what you think we all want.

Please DON'T vote unless you're a member of 3SD.

Here are the pitfalls of each-

On-Disc:

Rosters will have inaccurate players, player numbers and potentially equipment compared to where the NFL is when the game is released. However, the ability to have full cuts is the main draw.

First Roster Update:

Most accurate rosters of the four, will likely include all transactions made up to the game's release. Less player cuts are mandatory, possibly all gone. If this were to happen, we'd develop a system to fill rosters so cuts could still happen.

On-Disc, Update with Trades:

More accurate than original on-disc, but still will have the inaccuracies of more minor things like numbers (more so since there's no way to edit them.) Still wouldn't have free agent signings like STL FB Ovie M or Supplemental Draft Browns WR Josh Gordon.

Don't Care:

You should care, it affects the entire league. :-D

[Steve_OS]

First roster update, more accurate/less cuts.

[ovfd55]

Don't care

Also for third option contracts and cap would be affected cuase doubt people sign for exact same as real life and how if you cut someone if it affect cap

if I had to choose I would go option 2 but voted for don't care

[seasprite]

First roster update

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

[sir psycho]

I voted for on-disc/make trades....because for whatever reason I was thinking that the first roster update wasn't until after week 1 of the regular season, instead of right around when the game releases(i think). So my vote should be for first roster update. But I would be fine with either of those two options.

Sorry for the mix-up

[RedZoneD25]

Quote: Originally Posted by sir psycho

I voted for on-disc/make trades....because for whatever reason I was thinking that the first roster update wasn't until after week 1 of the regular season, instead of right around when the game releases(i think). So my vote should be for first roster update. But I would be fine with either of those two options. Sorry for the mix-up

No worries, thanks for the heads up, I'll be sure to +1 the final count.

[ChrisWC4]

I would like the 1st roster update. Kind of a jersey fanatic so proper numbers & equipment is huge for me. Of course willing to compromise but yea, 1st update sounds good

[CM Hooe]

First roster update with roster filling procedure.

In the event that this option is chosen, I would appreciate if a team's user has right of first refusal to low-ranked players (ballpark it at < 70 OVR) and drafted/undrafted rookies cut during his team's real-life minicamp; that is, players that are in FA in the first roster update that were on the team for the on-disc roster or in real life at some point this offseason after the conclusion of the NFL Draft. Call it the Chase Minnifield rule, if you will (assuming he doesn't get removed from the game for being IR'd).

[Skyboxer]

Quote: Originally Posted by Steve_OS

First roster update, more accurate/less cuts.

Ditto... I look at it as a way to play a few more games and get setting where we want. Then game on!!

[RedZoneD25]

Quote: Originally Posted by CM Hooe

First roster update with roster filling procedure. In the event that this option is chosen, I would appreciate if a team's user has right of first refusal to low-ranked players (ballpark it at < 70 OVR) and drafted/undrafted rookies cut during his team's real-life minicamp; that is, players that are in FA in the first roster update that were on the team for the on-disc roster or in real life at some point this offseason after the conclusion of the NFL Draft. Call it the Chase Minnifield rule, if you will (assuming he doesn't get removed from the game for being IR'd).

I'm calling it the Cliff Harris rule if he's cut by then, lol...but I like the idea of a first rights concept (totally optional for each team.) It certainly wouldn't be a free for all. Still coming up with a design plan though..

Then again in your case, if he is IRed, he should technically remain on the team's roster. Who knows what will happen though, that's something we won't know until we get the game.