West Coast League: Team Selection Criteria

[Eaglesfan27]

What is the maximum overall rating we should allow teams to have for the initial selection? I think 80 provides the best balance of challenge and a few teams to select from each conference, but a slight increase above that will allow more teams to be selected. I think if we go too much higher than that, we risk human teams becoming dominant.

[Sun Tzu]

Sub 80, no question at all. Just for the sake of nobody starting out 36-0 right off the bat, and nabbing half the 5 star prospects every year.

[Kodos]

Yeah, it'd be more fun to watch teams climb the ladder, rather than start of at the top and dominate forever.

[Galaxy]

I went with 80...Does that mean we include teams that have a 80 rating, or all teams just under 80?

[Eaglesfan27]

There are no teams with an 80 overall rating, but for purposes of the other options, I meant for it to be equal or less than the option you select.

[Terps]

It should definitely be under 80, but I didn't read the thread beforehand, so I voted other. So, add another one to 80.

[Raiders Army]

The 80s were a good time. Much better than the 90s.

[Sun Tzu]

http://www.sinosplice.com/~aperifle/Wham.jpg

Last Christmas I gave you my heart. But the very next day you gave it away.

[Raiders Army]

Ummm...maybe the music, not necessarily the clothes. ;)

[kingnebwsu]

I said 80. But if someone had to use an 81-rated team in a conference that only has 4 choices (Big 10 & SEC I believe) then I would maybe/probably be okay with that. We'll see what conferences win in the selection first.

[Galaxy]

I said 80. But if someone had to use an 81-rated team in a conference that only has 4 choices (Big 10 & SEC I believe) then I would maybe/probably be okay with that. We'll see what conferences win in the selection first.

Well, we are going with 4 conferences with 3 teams. So that shouldn't be a problem.